A good example of how not to make a movie and a fun work out for critics

Rating: 3/10 (9 March 2016)

First, I'd like to say that this is my second time watching this movie after the buzz it created when I was still a teenager. I decided to give it another shot out of nostalgia and a boring Sunday.
I have read enough reviews here to not repeat the overall sentiment that most people had watching this movie but I wanted to leave a couple of questions regarding the movie's general ability to think that its viewers are complete idiots:
1.Does turning into a vampire just involve getting a new sultry eyeshadow look and a sense of style or is there more to that?
2.If vampires are supposed to be pale and morbid looking then why on earth are the ones from the Amazon and Morrocco perfectly healthy looking? Also Sheen's foundation was definitely creasing and sooo obvious it was painful to watch.
3.Why doesn't Bella's dad even budge on the fact that his daughter got married at 18, disappeared and then came back with a baby? And why didn't he turn up to their house previously asking where she was since they live down the road?
4.Lastly, I don't understand how no one has mentioned this before: the vision of Alice (which I believe is not in the book) and essentially the most liked scene of the entire movie has no basis. Her power is about seeing the future and if the Volturi decided to not got through the whole killing thing then the vision that she has and shows shouldn't even exist in the first place right? This makes the whole scene even more irrelevant and a desperate move to finally put some action into a desperate movie.
Finally, I don't particularly like any of the actors but I must say that Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart looked a little bit more alive which made me think that they're really showing how happy they are to finish off the worst mistake of their career.