The never-ending movie . . .

Rating: 3/10 (16 January 1999)

The direction was great; the lighting was good; the music wasn't bad at all; the actors were excellent; it definitely had potential; why, oh why then, was this such a horrible movie? It's the lack of a four letter word beginning with p and ending with lot. After the first two hours you just stop caring. I can think of about 10 places where this movie should have ended but didn't. Maybe there is some hidden symbolism, but who cares? I don't feel that this movie had an effect on me (except that now I'm thinking of becoming an editor . . . ) I would recommend that you avoid this one, but I think that you almost have to see it for yourself to believe that it was produced.