wrong movie for the title. it was boring and clichéd

Rating: 3/10 (31 July 2017)

if mr zuck didn't like this movie, he should have financed his own and overseen the production, starting with the script. that probably wouldn't have been any more accurate than this movie was. i bet the mediation to make sure ALL the facts of all those involved made it into the movie would take infinitely longer than the real life lawsuits shows in the movie. i tried watching it. for a movie about facebook, you know, the social network mentioned in the title, it was all about legal disputes. so what? could have covered all that in about five lines in an epilogue. so what about the book it was based on. boring book that didn't seem to cover the feel good parts of the happy accidents of the world choosing facebook over the already established yahoo360, friendster and myspace who paved the way for facebook that probably otherwise wouldn't exist. mark zuck and co didn't invent social networking as this movie seemingly gives them all the credit for. they got lucky. why was facebook infinitely more successful than its predecessors is what should have been covered as well. it should have also included why no other soc/net never tried after. mind you, twitter, instigram and such are doing well but not to the same extent. why did the world choose f/b over the rest?﻿