The derfrence between Shawshank redemption and the others

Rating: 10/10 (28 February 2014)

The story, has 3 power points that make it the best movie ever made. One is when the young prisoner, Tommy, tells them that he knows the killer of Dufrense's wife. One when we discover that the whole time Dufrence was digging the wall; and one when Norton sees the big hole in the wall. This three points makes it easier for the director to say the movie's result: hope. The other movies such as The Gosfather don't have such points; that makes them always "the second movie". Tim Robbins' playing as Andy Dufrence, is surly one of the most important points that makes the film like this. I never would understand why they didn't give any Oscar Awards to him. But also, Morgan Freeman wasn't as good as should be. his smiles, looked really fake, but there is surly no problem with the narrating.Freeman's soft deep voice was the best option for this movie; but in acting, he was just "Normal"; that isn't enough for a movie like The Shawshank Redemption. In the year 1994, Shawshank redemption and pulp fiction were both good, but the thing that makes Shawshank redemption better, are the little strong points, all over the movie, I insinuated.