An endurance test

Rating: 8/10 (17 July 2016)

I've seen this film three times, and have realized that it seems like it gets longer with subsequent viewings. This is definitely a theater film as the small screen does not do it justice. It's brilliantly realized and atmospheric in the theater, but kind of a snoozer on the couch. The film opens with an exhilarating battle scene as Aboriginals barrel down on a group of fur trappers. This fight scene is fluid and organic and appears to have been shot in a single take. It sets a gritty tone for this film and the rest if it's run time holds nothing back. A Bear mauling about 45 minutes into this film is a standout scene and a true technical marvel to behold. However, there are long stretches of this film where Leo is crawling in the muck and moaning like a whale that really grates on the senses and can test the viewers patience. The main issue I have with this film is that it is an immense exercise of style over substance. Take away the directorial flair, the technical achievements, the massive scope, and what you have is a pretty convention revenge film. The effort is certainly appreciated, and is felt throughout the film. But, to view this film on the couch will take a lot of effort from the viewer not to get up and do something that is less strenuous. Watching someone with serious injuries gasp and crawl in the muck for an hour is surely not what some folks will view as entertaining. If you missed the chance to see this film in the theater note that it is a long film that feels a half hour longer on the small screen. A merely good film at home, but a great film in the theater. You will feel the main character's struggles more in a dark theater that enhances the film's fantastic sound design and crisp cinematography. The opening fight scene, the fantastic directing, the bear mauling, the acting (especially from a grizzled Tom Hardy), and the ending are definitely worth giving this film a look if you can stomach some of the more wince worthy parts and the exhausting run-time. I was not a fan of Alejandro's Birdman , but I can say that he at least deserves one of the three Oscars he has won. A truly brilliant director with a great eye for visuals. 8 out of ten for the breathtaking experience it gave me in the theater. Be warned, this film does not have much lasting appeal,as three viewing and 450 minutes of precious time is enough spent on relatively surface dwelling film that could be well scratched with just one sitting.