A beautiful, well-acted movie.

Rating: 8/10 (17 February 2019)

I like this movie. a lot. too bad I like it because of how beautiful it looks than because of anything else.
Lets start with the photography, the cinematography, the special effects and the makeup: Godlike. Pure magnificence. Clean and pure images of nature being nature: a cruel indomitable mistress. The photography was, unfortunately, mostly padding. It had moments it was necesary, but most of the time it felt just like padding.
The story is solid, with a lot artistic licenses (i.e. lies) over the real tale, but in general the plot and story are solid, but have a problem: they are easily forgotten. You have no idea of the time passing between scenes because the movie refuses to tell you and a revenge tale like this really required to track the time better.
The acting was amazing, although I found the weakest being Poulter (seriously, how do you get work?) followed by DiCaprio. Tom Hardy ate Fitzgerald And Gleeson was born to be Henry. I am not saying DiCaprio do not deserve an Oscar, but this movie was not the reason he deserved it. If you give me rotten meat to eat i could vomit too, where is my Oscar? He deserves it for other movies (I adored him in the Departed and it was the greatest actor in Titanic), but not this one.
In short: Entertaining, well done, beautiful movie that you will forget the moment you see any other movie with a plot. Would watch again anyway.