Not for Oscar

Rating: 5/10 (5 June 2016)

The world wanted Leonardo Di Caprio take an Oscar. I can't say he didn't deserve one, but he's played far better and more difficult roles such as at Shutter Island or Wolf of Wall Street. However, the academy gave him one, in my opinion, not because he totally deserved it but in order to calm and appease us all. Now, about the movie. The whole story threw him obstacles and hardships that made me feel sorry for him and not congratulate him for his acting skill, which has shown us in the past that is very big. Nice plans and photographs, but unfortunately that's the only thing that I can find to say some good words. The whole story was predictable and closed very fast. The screenplay took to long showing us Di Caprio shouting and falling and eating whatever he found than it should and concluded very abruptly. Never the less, Tom Hardy played extremely well and that boosts up the average. As for Iñárritu I didn't like what he said at the Oscar awards and made the whole thing worst for him. To sum up:
Di Caprio = Can do a lot better, Tom Hardy = Very good again, Photography = Very good, Screenplay = Predictable with many copies
5/10