Entertains but nothing new about it, (pretentious).

Rating: 5/10 (18 March 2018)

There were certain moments while watching this film, where I couldn't stop thinking ''Oh, God really?''.
Since the first minutes in, you can notice the rush: three minutes and you have the first sex scene, and twenty minutes after that, you begin with the breaking-up part. The way scenes are sequenced don't let you enjoy them not even a little bit. This broken way to tell the story, ruins everything else, that only can be saved by Winslet's performance.
Also, the absurdity of dialogs, (sometimes turning a little cringy to hear the whole conversation), can't just get away.
I suppose people actually like The Reader, because it ''moves'' with a 'human topic' that can't be forgotten, but there's a moment after you hear it that much in movies, books and everything else, that you have to look beyond it: you try to find structure, form and technique. This movie doesn't work due to its lack of proper ways to be narrated and its pretentious 'pseudo-philosophical' exagerations about important topics like guilt and moral values, just far away from true human nature and compassion; I talk about the last scene when the writer/jew/surviver says the horrors that happened to the Jewish people were the worst thing that has happened ever, (but logically, that's not true, people still suffer and had suffered before all along human history, and giving that importance to this, avoids total human empathy, not even close to reality).
I read somewhere that this movie is actually a good film-adaptation of the book, so I can't imagine how painfully must be to read it.