The cons of being a wallflower

Rating: 3/10 (25 January 2016)

Let's get right into the nitty-gritty. It has terribly wooden acting, a shallow and basic script that is wholly reliant on jump-cuts to fill in the gaping, disjointed gaps, and an agenda-pushing narrative that implies feminine men and dominant women in a relationship is a good thing: as biologically insane as that is. No doubt, 'liberal' people will be 'offended' by this; but the truth is unalterable, it's time to see this film for what it is; a facet of the big-money Rothschild-funded neo-feminist movement that is seriously damaging the congruity of organic society, it has the front-runner feminist Watson in it for Christ's sake. 'Charlie' (Logan Lermon, or something like that) develops rather barely as a character, by the end of the film he hasn't changed a notch, and to be quite honest I never resonated with him as a character. His buddy, whatnot, can't recall his name, ah yeah - Patrick, was nicely acted, and some other characters were decent as well. It had a basic plot that failed to captivate an audience that isn't new- wave millennial, pre-pubescent teenage girls. The end, avoid like the plague.