Another 'Gibson'

Rating: Null/10 (30 January 2011)

was my first thought, by which I meant 'historically inaccurate' which is a pity as I know Americans who think it's an accurate portrayal of their history (my second thought was 'Hollywood'!!) which is bad enough but Gibson should know better so why does he make these sorts of inaccurate films? Money of course. Ham it up & the dumb punters will flock in with it by the barrow load. Thank goodness there are people around on sites like this to put the record straight. HOWEVER it is a dramatic film but should be shown with warnings about the inaccuracies. The filming and costumes and the whole production is excellent but as I say, as others have, spoiled by the anti-British tenor.