I was not impressed

Rating: 5/10 (4 November 2012)

Do not call this a "historical movie". It is full of inaccuracies, and even right down lies. Call it "inspired by", or even "based on", but not historical.
How can actors and actresses agree to collaborate in such rewriting of history. How can producers and directors make such movies, pretending it to be historical? Knowing that a lot of people don't know the real history or don't care to verify...? I may be old fashioned about this, but I can't agree with this way of changing history for the sake of getting more audience.
Furthermore (and I wasn't aware of this problem before watching - I never read comments before, but I happen to be an "amateur historian" or at least, very interested in history), I wasn't very impressed by the actors... I found the whole thing sad, at some moments.
I can't get out more than 5/10, and that is for some good images, and some minor characters. I'm sorry...