Mummy? or Prince of Egypt?

Rating: Null/10 (13 May 2001)

ok, the plot sucked, the acting sucked, and the special effects... you guessed it. it looks like hollywood still hasn't figured out that computer effects are worthless if they can be recognized as computer effects. you shouldn't find yourself saying, "whoa, that was some good cgi." if it really WAS good, you wouldn't say that. you would have to sit up and say, "whoa that looked cool, how did they do that?" the mummy looks like a cartoon, and it's hard to suspend disbelief when you're watching what's supposed to be an action/horror movie and it just looks like a cartoon.
2 out of 10.
ps for a reference of good computer effects, see the "mask" effects in mission: impossible 2.