some what better than the first one

Rating: 5/10 (5 May 2001)

I can explain this in a few words. better special effects. Great looking mummy,but two many plot holes. The book for the sequel is alot better but if a lot of stuff had been in the movie that was in the book than the movie would have been rated R. And you know that the unviversal people know that r rated movies don't work with kid. I thought the first one was very original. There was just something about it that made go yeah this is going to be a winner with me. But as usual when you try to hype a sequel and expect it to be better. Well 9 times out of 10 it is a miss but since the original did make 140 million in the us. I suspect that the sequel will surpass it. Some things that did impress me where the special effects. I thought that the rock was perfect for the role ,and I don't even like the wwf. Next I thought that it was great to see a returning cast of pretty much everyone makes it even better. But the plot had too many plot holes and didn't impress me. I won't say don't go see it but just be warned that you might be dissapointed as I was. I gave this and 8/10 for The Rocks perfomance and for the special effects other wise it was just okay.\
Since this is the summer watch for reviews by me. I will give a review and then a review out of 10