A little iffy on it, but I liked it anyway.

Rating: Null/10 (16 October 1999)

What was the point of all the crosses, buddhas, etc. ad nauseum? Couldnt this guy pick a faith?!
Would the mummy not see the star of david and run away, "ahhhh! not Yahweh again! i'm in deep caca now! Moses is gonna have my hide"?
Where did the plagues come from? ISTR that if Seti is killed, then Ramses II is the new pharaoh, and the ten plagues havent happened yet (which, incidentally, were administered by Yahweh, not the masonic gods of egypt), how the @#$! would Imhotep know anything about them if he was buried alive shortly thereafter?!
Then again, Imhotep was a scientist, a doctor, and an architect (who built the great pyramid at saqqarah, i might add) under Djeser, not under seti! that would be 4800 years ago, NOT 3,000!
And come to think of it, Imhotep was more like our founding fathers than he was a screwed up priest who slaughtered pharaohs. Historically incorrect in the absolute. Ticked me off a little with the "you speak the slave language" crap (altho, this was historically correct - he died long before (according to the film, and history) we were freed from goshen.)
Other than that, it was an alright movie. FX were ok, the rendering was crappy with regards to the animated mummy (the basement guy from return of the living dead was more convincing), but the animation/texturing was good.
Sure, he can see with the screwed up eyes, but how the heck can he talk without a larynx (or lips, for that matter)?!
Acting was so-so, the "me and the mummy scream at each other" bit was stupid, yet funny, as I myself would do such a thing (reminds me of gross anatomy lab - "i lost my sandwich in his mesentary!")
The scenery was beautiful. A little advice for the CGI guys at ILM, get a better raytracer - on second thought, GET A RAYTRACER! That scanline stuff only looked good in toy story! That mummy looks like it came off my A500!