What did the critics see in this?

Rating: 5/10 (4 October 1999)

The critics said "Camp." I just say stupid. And poor acting! But that's okay, because most of the dialog was not really worth the ferric oxide it's recorded on.
Ten years ago, the special effects would have been amazing, but now I've seen all that.
Rachel W. is pretty good (though vapid) looking, and that's about the most positive thing I, a male, can say about the movie. It bored me so much I had to take two evenings to see it all.
So - don't believe the critics, believe the IMDB voting. This film is not worth it.