The fist

Rating: 1/10 (22 March 2014)

not the mist, the fist...i first gave it a 4, even tho i wanted to rate with a 1, then i saw many 1 so i thought myself, let's give this "movie" what i wanted to give. anyway I'm seriously thinking that maybe we should contact the staff because how could it get 7,4? there must be some mistakes. especially by seeing that there are many 1, so what's that? others voted 10.
anyway movie is awful for plenty of reason: -guy's acting is awful: stresses 2 much sadness, anger, worry mood. -children: i usually never had anything against children acting, also because they are children, but this boy i have to say is even more awful than the father: every time crying, like he's 3 rs old, but he was let's say 7, so they over put sadness and desperation feelings on his character with a grotesque and really annoying results. - the overall acting crew: awful. 2 much exaggerating the feeling of fear when faced with the "monsters". - the monsters: if i was there id be probably prone to play with them rather than being scared by. honestly, i don't know who drew them, probably the very same boy, but they look like children toys, they are even funny. plus it was 2007, so not the 90s, and special effects are awful. and the monster idea, concept is so poor, we saw tentacles anywhere else come on. and then there is no link between the fog and this kind of monster. as i read the plot and read of "creatures", i figured out of something like zombies, so something like a virus attacking people, converting thus to some horrible creatures, zombie- like. but here, why for god sake should an octopus come out of a fog? OK its fiction, but when it is so unreal, it gets more the shapes of comics, falling into a grotesque result. exactly like the acting main form.
So i don't know what genial mind is behind this, who drew the monsters, who wrote the stenography (sounds very much copied by Romero's zombie movie when they are trapped into a mall, now that is a horror movie!), but they are all linked by this sort of really really annoying over exaggerating: in the acting, in the feelings bad express by indeed the acting, so even the feelings get to be grotesque, even if at first, may be sharable (everybody would be scared in such a situation, but due to the also unreal, prone to comics, again grotesque, shape of the monster, we do not see ourselves in such a situation, too wrongly unreal, too grotesque, as i said:id rather play with them rather than fight them, at first glance), in the monsters, even the final was so trivial, obvious and foreseeable. and what surprises me the most is that the director directer 2 amazing movies, they are amongst my fa vs, on the top 10: the thing redemption and the green mile. so horror is probably not his field or that time he had something else in his mind. anyway surely he wasn't surrounded by valid collaborators, because if i was there, i would have told him: what the f*@ are you doing?? now relax, sit on the director's chair (that classic one with director on it) take some beer, even smoke something, and let me clear up this mess and let's get to some good insight and thus result...no really.y this movie is an insult to cinema, to acting, and to his to previous masterpieces (for me they indeed are), they are an insult to his mind. of course this movie doesn't change the esteem i have for him, and the great app reaction and really deep love for those 2 movies, but this "movie" is clearly an insult to them. this movie's film should be burned, and the movie deleted from the web and from our minds,with the MIB machine: OK, now look at this light: you never watched this movie, this movie never existed. we would do a favor ourselves and to him. for head be remembered only for those 2 movies, not something like this, anyway i remember him for those 2, but well whatever about this, as i said, ill just think that period he had something else, or anyway his reasons to do this...cheers