The TRUTH about this movie

Rating: 4/10 (15 May 2008)

I see this is a very appreciated movie. It appears that it's very scary, spectacular, original, even the best picture of the year.
Although I'm only 18, I think I've watched more movies then all the people who consider that "The Mist" deserves a 10/10 altogether.
There is really nothing that impressed me while watching "The Mist". I have no problem with the SF elements like the mist and it's private fauna; there is not one original thing in this movie, it is totally predictable (this culminates with the ending).
The acting is acceptable, the visual effects are average (they're OK, not spectacular), the sound tracks are quite lousy (and this could have been much more better); the movie is quite... "static", most of the action happens in just one building.
Even the few good thing about this movie are predictable, like "There are no atheist in a crashing plane" (you'll get the point if you watch the movie); personally I recommend a psychology book.
But what really gets to me is that cheap movies like "The Mist", which are supposed to be horror, are so appreciated (IMDb's current user rating 7.5/10) while other good, even great movies, horror or not (e.g. "Exorcist: The Beginning" - 5.0/10 IMDb's user rating), are considered just a waste of time, and I think usually by people that haven't even watched them.
I guess I've watched to many movies, and I watched this one in a rainy day. However, what I've said it's true.
P.S. Please excuse any grammatical mistakes; English is not my native language.