NOT AWESOME...BUT GOOD...WAY BETTER THAN THE SECOND

Rating: 8/10 (16 November 2003)

Although I'll always firmly adhere that the first film is a category of it's own, the third film was not NEARLY as bad as I'd heard......if you're willing to excuse...
The first BORING twenty minutes of the film... The stotic and useless demise of Trinity. All the holes opened by the second film, all the useless dialogue that never got resolved...
The movie's end is fine...but emotionally dry...or fake...or something... ...not a GREAT film... but certainly not a HIGHLANDER 2.