What's all this crap about a bad movie?

Rating: Null/10 (7 November 2003)

After the first Matrix we got rid of all non-scifi people, the second one we lost the non-philosophy crowd and now only the die-hards survived. What wrong with you people? The comments look familiar, the first one was the best or there aren't any cool new actors introduced. These are the same people that write that Pearl Jam's first album Ten was the best ever..or that Command & Conquer's Red Alert didn't have enough new figures to play with. Pearl Jam still kicks ass and C&C was excellent playing. Who cares that you no longer have questions to ask whether Morpheus is pregnant or Mr Smith will play in the Blues Brothers 2003? The story is finished, the showdown was great and the fighting in the Dome unsurpassed. I think this historic battle will be re-enacted for years to come by the same people that use tin soldiers to analyze Waterloo (Wouldn't it be better if the stream of Sentinels flanked instead of a full frontal?).
All movies have something to nitpick (for me it's the fact that there are too many romantic scenes in this one.. probably caused by the Sentimentals: those flying machines who can apparently carry a lot of violins), but let's not forget that this was an awesome movie. The W's only had to make 4 movies to be in the same league as Starwars or LOTR.that's quite an achievement. 8 out of 10 for this one!
BTW the most hysterical thing was in the trailer preceding the Matrix: It claims that Tom Cruise is the last samurai.