Pseudo movie

Rating: Null/10 (17 November 2004)

I'm sure this appeals to a generation so wrapped up in video games that they only want to see more of that when they go to movies. But this is barely more than a video game. It has pseudo-acting, pseudo-philosophy, pseudo-science and a pseudo-plot. It surely couldn't have interested anyone past the age of 25. The first two of this "trilogy"...really more like a puzzle with 3 parts, none standing alone but when put together does at least form a whole...were more "real" and interesting. But strip away the mumbo-jumbo and what we're left with is a lot of people wandering around looking like they are on massive doses of thorazine, amusing machines that look like they came from the old Star Wars trilogy and antiquated ideas of what weapons of the XXX century will probably be like (the idea that they will be firing bullets, nothing more than hot lead, at these futuristic all-devouring machines is truly silly science.) In fact there is not one thing that is believable ...maybe that appeals to adolescents, but to anyone who has seriously thought about the future, one would hope they would have developed more imaginative weapons, better speaking skills, better ability to emote and lead lives that have more meaning. This is barely a 5 out of 10.