Another one bites the dust.

Rating: Null/10 (6 November 2003)

Well, if you check the rating of the first movie: 8.5 Check the second: 7.3 The third: 6.5
Anyone else see a trend here?
The first movie was revolutionary. In technology, story, you name it. The second added more bang, but started to get into an arena of "higher thinking" that made a lot of people go, "Huh?" The third movie... made a lot of people go "ugh!"
There are several parts of it that were incredible, nothing less than I expected, but as a whole - well, let's just say I was checking my watch a lot more than I thought I should be. Did I mind paying the money to see it on the big screen? Nah. Will I recommend it to my friends? Only with a grain of salt.
Like many people here, I agree - if you liked the second movie, you are more likely to enjoy this one. If you didn't like Reloaded, consider this your word of caution for Revolutions.
Maybe the first movie didn't play up the religious/philosophical aspects enough to prepare us for the second and third? The friend I saw it with liked it more than the second and thought it was great! She appreciated the "higher" aspects of the movie. I expected (hoped) for something else... she got what she wanted, I was let down.
If you liked it, kudos for you. If not, I sympathize. If you haven't seen it yet, I wish you the best!