Overstuff sequel that does not satisfy.

Rating: Null/10 (14 October 2004)

Yes, this is the second part of a trilogy but as a movie by itself it lacks the goods to be satisfying. There are way too many questions that are raised here but not an enough of an effort to at least give a hint about what is going on. In another words, this film needed to at least give a solid story as part as a whole than to cut it off at the end with out much explanation about what is happening right in front of you. A good example of a solid middle entry in a trilogy is The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. It not only expanded what was set forth with the first entry but also gave a solid story with an ending that raises the issues of what will come in the next chapter.
Don't get me wrong, it's a good movie but it needed to stand on its own feet to be a solid one.