Failure of sequel not a surprise - since original wasn't anything special to me..

Rating: 1/10 (26 June 2003)

This may not be the worst movie of all time - but it does not belong anywhere near the TOP-100 list. People that think highly of this movie are too eager to give the special effects (albeit original) way too much credit towards the actual worth of the movie. If it really was the "story" of the movie that attracted the crowds to the original, the 2nd movie would have done much better. But since the effects are no longer "special" to a lot folks, it appears a lot of people are saying "NO THANKS" to seeing the sequel. Which backs up my feelings on the first movie. The story/acting was ok - but didn't WOW me in the least. Reeves is not a great actor - regardless of how much you adore him.