You'd think they would have learned from "Congo", but NO......

Rating: Null/10 (1 February 1999)

There's a very simple fact that the creators from this flick missed out on- if you trade in the plot for some impressive sight gags, you'll be left with a bad movie with good fx. If they'd stuck closer to the plot of Michael Cricton's novel, the product would have been a deep, intelligent movie with good fx. I was deeply disappointed that the real issues that Cricton brought up were largely ignored. Besides that, most of the movie was downright silly. A pathetic movie when compared to the original and when you consider the quality of the material and talent they had to work with.