I HATE THIS MOVIE!!!!!

Rating: Null/10 (15 March 1999)

Sorry, just had to get that out of my system. Okay, sorry, people, but PLEASE don't tell me that this was made by Steven Spielberg. NO!! It can't be! How could this piece of crap disgrace the Almighty Hollywood King's name? Why did they have to make it a version of Godzilla? Is this movie even worthy of the title: "The sequel to 'Jurassic Park'?"
We're all entitled to our personal opinions in this country, you may think what you like, but, no offense, this movie was just unnecessary and stupid. Okay, so maybe parts of it were good, but it was nothing near Jurassic Park. Now *that* was a good movie. But this? Yeah, right. (They couldn't even get Sam Neill back in it!!) I was barely able to sit through all of this movie. Ian's daughter, Kelly, had no part what-so-ever---she basically just followed everyone around. And when that huge trailer is hanging off of the cliff being suspended by that little car? Give me a break!
I honestly don't remember anything about this movie--I don't WANT to remember anything about this movie, to tell you the truth--and therefore cannot critique it as well. I just think it's too overrated and that Spielberg and the gang could've done better.
-2001Rulz
P.S.--Oh, and aren't we forgetting the ORIGINAL inspriration for "The Lost World?" No, I'm not talking about Michael Crichton's novel, I mean Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's book "The Lost World." "Oh, well, guys, we don't *need* to credit *him*, right?? The general public would think that seeing a movie that was based on a book by an author who wrote classics is uncool, huh??"