Dinosaur-sized pile of cr*p.

Rating: 1/10 (15 July 2007)

Boy, it stinks that one has to waste time to come up with 10 lines to write about this pile of dinosaur dung. The screenplay was stunningly BAD, the casting was HORRIBLE, and so not surprisingly, the acting STUNK as badly as the so- called "plot." Schlockberg has completely "Lost" whatever it was he had. So apparently, all one needs is a bunch of "great" computer generated visuals, and that is enough for knuckleheads to gush over something that is just dinosaur-sized BAD. How do you not end up "padding the comment with junk" when you are writing ABOUT junk? Is this to eliminate HONEST, insightful commentary, which on a terrible film, won't take up much space? Why not LIMIT the number of lines to less than it is now (is there a limit?) so we don't have to read on and on to a bunch of gushing goop?