Great action, great film. Veeerrrry underrated.

Rating: 8/10 (8 June 2005)

OK, I know that a lot of people have a grudge with movie, even more than the campy Jurassic Park III, which was inferior to the first two combined. I, for one, loved this movie almost as much as the first one. Why?
Well, for one thing, if there was ever any bad acting, I could hardly notice it. I was too wrapped up in its suspense and story. The characters aren't as memorable as the guys we grew up with in the first Jurassic Park, but they're certainly not as wooden or as boring as the new cast of Jurassic Park III (besides the ever-loving Sam Neil).
And like I said; even if there were any bad acting to be found in this movie, then the action would certainly more than make up for that. I mean, a herd a raptors killing bunches of men in foliage? An army of compys ganging up on one lowly man? That bastard T-Rex going on that classic rampage, eating victims alive, especially at the city of San Diego, in a deliciously satisfying way? What's not to love about this film?!