Why change unneccesary things?

Rating: Null/10 (29 December 2002)

***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Well a good one after all. I don't know why I think the first one was better, maybe because I was expecting more after seeing the first one. You can't complain about Jackson's direction, or about the photo, brilliant, but why can't he stay away from making unnecessary modifications? Why take away the woods from the fighting at Helms deep? Why put some elves there? Money? We know that elves are big bucks. I'm not against the wolf rider fight, but why let Aragorn fall down from a cliff? Isn't the film exciting enough? But i can live with all that but I won't forgive him from change Faramir's personality, i see no reason, it's clear in the book! He has not the same personality as Boromir (his brother), he is cleaver; no muscleman. And why get them to Osgiliath and meet the black rider? And one of the most terrible things, letting Sam bee so sentimental! Is it to pleas the Americans? S*** man let them see that kind of crap in their own films!