Makes people expect a lot from "The Return o the King"

Rating: 10/10 (31 December 2002)

I read many comments from so many people, and I realized that people are not happy with the changes that Peter Jackson put it in the adaptation.
The ones that actually read the "The Two Towers" could realize that between the three volumes, the second one would be the most difficult to put in a regular time-line story. They are forgetting that one of the most important tools in the book is the narrator, which is not used in the film. It is necessary learn to respect the differences between the movie and the book, otherwise, "The Fellowship" would be a completely failure as an adapted film, because they put too much from the second book in the first movie. In my opinion, the ones who loved the first film are going to love the second one, and the ones who hated "The Fellowship of The Ring" are going to hate "The Two Towers". The only real danger is the expectation for the third movie, because the ones who read "The Return of The King" are expecting a lot of perfection, and Peter Jackson cannot miss on that one.
I liked this film because I simply LOVE the book. Peter Jackson is doing an extraordinary work. He knew the It would be risky to do it, and everybody knows, or should know, that it wouldn't be perfect. I think that the curriculum of all the ones involved in the "Lord of The Rings" project will be divided in before-L.R. and after-L.R.