Return of the King isn't the best of the trilogy.

Rating: 8/10 (24 May 2015)

I hoped that it is better than The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers although both of them are perfect. Why? Because it holds a 95% "Fresh" rating on the aggregate review site Rotten Tomatoes and holds a score of 94 out of 100 on Metacritic, it is ranked #9 in IMDb with an average score of 8.9. And it won 11 Oscars in 2004, included Best Picture.
But after I saw it, I thought it can't be better than the first two films. Example, when Aragorn refused Ã‰owyn, she fell in love with Faramir without reason? It is a poor romantic comedy film? Don't make me laugh. I heard the song, it's very sad and it made me to sleep right now. The big problem is the length of the film, 4h23 minutes, too long! It's very hard to remember the plot of the film.
But the point make me gave this film 8 out of 10 (Firstly I gave it from 5-7) is the main characters and the battles. I prefer Sam to Frodo. He is the bet performance of the trilogy. He try to help Frodo although he was removed of the journey by Frodo (exactly Smeagol). This is friendship, the most powerful treasure of the world. And Smeagol, he was killed by his ambition, the Ring. And the battles? It's very fantastic and perfect (but The Two Towers is better).
By the time, I hope that I will look on the bright side.
8/10
( sorry for my English because I'm Vietnamese and I'm 16)