Many variations from the book, but still masterful.

Rating: 10/10 (6 December 2003)

Don't worry...this won't contain any spoilers. I just returned from attending a showing of the movie in Palm Springs, including a witty talk by Sir Ian McKellan. I am "one of those" fans of Tolkien, who has read the books numerous times. I was truly disappointed with what Peter Jackson did to Faramir in "The Two Towers," but also realize there is a difference between film and novel in time to develop characters. Additionally, Jackson felt a need to make the relationship between Aragorn and Arwen stronger, to attract more viewers.
In "The Return of the King," he stays pretty true to the book. Though I personally disagree with creating a new storyline when time is of the essence (don't add, instead subtract, or combine characters and traits), regardless, I thoroughly enjoyed the third in the series. I might follow this up in a few weeks, with more to the point comments, but as the release date isn't for almost two weeks, it would be unfair to comment more than I have.
For those who have never read the books, you will love it. For those who read the books long ago and don't remember details, you also will love it. For those who are huge fans of the books and remember every detail, parts will annoy you. Yet, my guess is most of you will still remember that Jackson has done a fine job in depicting the works of Tolkien, with great special effects and characterization of a majority of the ensemble cast. Some of you won't get past those changes, but most of you will love it even with the somewhat flawed changes.