why number 6????

Rating: Null/10 (31 July 2003)

This WAS a good movie, but certainly lacks merit to be on the top 10. Reasons: 1) In many parts of this film(and in two towers) the director has assumed that the viewer has read the original book. Which is the first flaw any movie could have. 2) Only 'cool special effects' don't make a good movie. 3) Not realistic in the sense that even after Boromir gets hit by arrows at several places in the chest, not 'one' drop of blood is seen.(pls dont tell me tht was because kids could see the movie, tht would be the lamest excuse) 4) The story in the movie remains incomplete, sure it is continued in the next, but IN THE NEXT, so why is THIS FILM on the top 10????
LOGICAL ARGUMENTS WELCOMED....