do not overlook the artistry of this film

Rating: Null/10 (21 December 2001)

Let me start by saying that if I could pay IMDB more money to rate this movie higher than a 10, I would certainly do it. The movie is utterly deserving of praise.
In doing a film-adaptation of a book that is beloved by so many, you run two major risks: adhering too closely to the book (in which case, you don't really get to express much of your own creativity) or not adhering to the book enough (which could lead to losing the spirit of the book). Peter Jackson has found the happy middle-ground in glorious fashion. He is able to depict events and experiences from the book and fresh and original ways that, at the same time, give you the fullness of feelings that Tolkien meant to inspire.
Even if this film wasn't a film adaptation, it would still be a great movie because the artistry with which it is made. Let me mention just a few scenes:
-Gandalf's stand a Khazad-dum. The power with which Ian McKellan delivers his lines is unforgettable. In addition to his acting, other elements of the shot are incredibly well done. As he delivers those lines with strength and rage, the light of the Balrog's fire illuminates his dirtied face, reinforcing the feeling of rage.
-The various scenes of Frodo wearing the ring. The chaotic influence of the ring on its wearer is presented with incredible originality. I want to know who thought up this effect. Whoever you are, you are a GENIUS!
-Galadriel's temptation. A lot of people have complained about this scene, but I think it was superb. The transformation that takes place properly conveys the great power of Galadriel. In the original text, Tolkien hints at her power, but he keeps it a mystery. Given the time constraints of a film, Jackson didn't really have time to go into dialogues concerning Galadriel and her power. Instead, he tries to show us her power (and the threat it could potentially be) through a physical transformation. Jackson took a gamble that not everyone appreciates, but I certainly think it was an incredibly creative interpretation.
-Sam following Frodo into the river. No where on film have a witnessed a scene that better captures an individual's devotion to his friend. Despite knowing he can't swim, Sam wades into the river after Frodo, not even considering the danger. Astin plays this part with a moving childlike innocence. The slow underwater shots of Sam emphasize his unconditional devotion, as there are no looks of anger or panic on his face; only a look of longing to be with his friend.
I could go on and on about this film. There are so many scenes that are cleverly done and I commend the filmmakers for such refreshing creativity. I've seen it twice already, and I plan to see it many more times.