People just like to attack what they don't understand don't they?

Rating: 5/10 (13 July 2005)

It's painfully obvious to me that those who gave this movie 1/10 or 2/10 did it solely for the purpose of trying to knock it down a few notches on the top 250 list in order to bolster their own favorite movie. They didn't even bother to correct their spelling mistakes. Many people also seem to miss the point that Tolkien always meant for his book to be published all at once. It was never meant to be a trilogy. That was the fault of the publisher. They did not wish to publish such a huge volume all at once and therefore split it up into three separate parts. The same was applied to Peter Jackson's movie version of Tolkien's epic. So many people have written that they are confused about the movie yet do not bother to ask themselves why. Why are they confused about the movie? (Yes I consider all 3 movies to be ONE movie) It's because they fail to understand it's complexity and lash out in frustration and anger. But don't worry. These same people may be happier with other movies. God-awful movies which I won't mention. Wait, maybe I will >:) All the Godfather movies, Star Wars Episodes 1, 2, 3, 6, All the Star Trek movies except Wrath of Khan, The Passion of the Christ, Ordinary People (which amazingly actually won an Oscar for best Picture) Titanic (which is astoundingly still on IMDb's top 250 list), Braveheart, ugh the list goes on.
Fellowship of the Ring should not be considered as a movie on it's own. It is only PART OF A MOVIE. That being said, one of the confusing issues may be solved. But then again, given people's seemingly in-born tendency to bicker amongst themselves, we haven't seen the last of this "debate".