Good but could have been better.

Rating: 7/10 (21 November 2006)

Alright, I liked the movie, but I have mixed feelings.
First of all, you gotta give Jackson credit for his work, but it seems to me, that though he did a good job over all he did not really caught the magic of the books - and I don't mean in the movies, but he himself. The special-effects, the cast and and the production is great - but for acceptable alteration of the original story you find at least the same amount of really bad choices Jackson made. Let me just give th example of who is responsible for going through Moria in the book and on the other hand in the movie. Why change it to Frodo and give him the burden of Gandalf's death? Why do not let Aragorn take the broken sword out of Rivendell? These are just needless and bad alterations of the original story, and there are more examples for that kind of things.
But nevertheless the movies made a break for the fantasy-genre and will spawn a lot of movies from the same kind (or so I hope). Jackson deserves credit for that. The Lord of the Rings is something you have to see - but not something you have to like.