Not Satisfying

Rating: 5/10 (8 July 2003)

This movie was ok. I thought it's ending was a little abrupt, but the ending of the movie didn't really satisfy me. I don't think that we saw the bad guy get what he deserved for what he did. It seemed like the whole thing was a game. It just frustrates me because, why wouldn't they just kill him? If they want real revenge, why take all his money? He still had some of it left anyway. The whole climax seemed pointless to me. *SPOILERS* I know he dies anyway, but they didn't even plan on killing him until the friends of the guy Norton killed came into the picture. So, I give this movie a 4.5/10 because the ending was unsatifying, seemed abrupt, and I think the point of the movie was, well, pointless.