The *only* Incredible thing about this movie: Incredible how pathetically bad the CGI is.

Rating: 1/10 (12 June 2008)

The Incredible Hulk has Incredibly bad CGI. That is the one and only incredible thing about the whole movie.
The CGI looks like the paid an amateur video game modder 5 dollars, total, to make the best CGI Hulk he could.
In reality, they may have spent a bit more than 5 dollars and hired more than one amateur video game modder. But the end result *looks* like they *didn't*, and that is the only thing that counts.
The Incredible Hulk is rivalled only by I Am Legend, and the Ang Lee movie version of The Incredible Hulk from 2003, for having the very worst CGI of all-time.
Even the television Hulk from the 1970's looks *vastly* more believable and realistic than the CGI green turd Hulk in the Norton movie version does.
Some criticize the TV Hulk for being corny. Sure, he could be a bit corny, but *even so*, he is *still* INCREDIBLY more immersive and believable than this movie's 5-dollar-looking CGI fake green blob of crap is, which you *won't ever* believe is real for even one single second.
Besides, it is possible to use a human actor to play the Hulk *and* make the Hulk have a gritty, dark edge. Just because the TV Hulk was lighthearted and family-friendly, it doesn't mean that that is so *because* they used a human actor to play him. This is a huge fallacy in logic that defenders of the CGI green turd Hulk frequently make. But it's time to put that fallacy of logic to rest, permanently. The Hulk as played by a human actor could easily be every bit as gritty and dark as Batman or anyone else if the writers, director, and producers made him be so.
Movies like Iron Man and Transformers have shown that it's entirely possible to make a great movie using *good* CGI that does not in any way detract from the believability and quality of the movie. The Incredible Hulk with Norton is the exact opposite of that. The CGI green fake turd 5-dollar-looking blob of crap Hulk completely destroys the movie in every conceivable way.
The Hulk in this movie looks so awful, that by even putting it on the screen and expecting people to pay to see it is an insult to the intelligence of the viewing audience.
Bottomline: there is no excuse whatsoever for how pathetically bad the CGI Hulk in the Norton movie looks.