Where do l start

Rating: 1/10 (31 July 2010)

OK it is perfectly clear that the academy was just trying to say "in your face Cameron". and yeah they kinda did. The only way the academy can do that-by giving Best Picture of the Year to a god awful movie.
l mean come on! apparently they have no clue on what a realistic war movie is supposed to look like. First off, the movie is filled with so many inaccuracies like the main character taking off all of his gear upon seeing a car filled with explosives and latter being punched by a guy with a lower rank. Both of them are done for right then and there. moreover that same idiotic protagonist travels all the way across the town to a house he thinks is the house of a kid he befriended only to find him self threatening an innocent guy with a gun and then being yelled at by an old woman. So he just walks all the way to the base without being noticed by anybody.
l can go on forever with these stupidities but there's more to this movie than just a completely unbelievable plot. all the scenes were shaky and the camera movement was incredibly annoying. l could barely stand watching these wonky camera shots. THEY INVENTED SOMETHING CALLED A STEADYCAM YOU KNOW! And there were more crew members visible than ever before.
So yeah sucky script wonky camera shots and zero character development. Just what you'd expect from an academy award winning movie.
this just goes to show how WRONG the academy's idea of a good movie is and how the Oscars really don't matter