This film isn't biased!

Rating: 9/10 (28 March 2005)

I admit, I previously wrote an unfair review stating how biased this film was, but I am deciding to replace it. This film isn't very biased. There might be the odd niggly detail here and there, but many of the main "biased" points aren't actually biased! The main points are below.
Point 1: The people who made the film never actually said that the Hurricane beat a molester. That was never implied. That is what Hurricane described in his book; therefore it cannot be biased.
Point 2: Delapeche, I admit, was a good cop. He was never called a bad cop, or portrayed as one in the script. Again, this was what Hurricane wrote in his book. The makers of the film never freely incorporated a corrupt or racist cop in the script; only from Hurricanes eyes.
Point 3: Maybe he couldn't have achieved so many medals whilst in the army/navy. They never said he did! This was what Hurricane said happened. Had Hurricane never told a story, and this happened in the script, fair enough. But it didn't!
Point 4: When the man, dying in hospital, said Hurricane didn't kill the men, in fact said he did. But that is what Hurricane wrote in his book. So it is in fact viewed through the eyes of Hurricane.
Get my point????
10 out of 10 (for everyone who inaccurately dissed it!)