It's not always a good decision to split books in parts.

Rating: 5/10 (20 November 2015)

I'm not a big fan of Hunger Games, I love it but not going mad for it. But after watching Catching Fire (which in my opinion was a great movie and best in the series) I waited so hard for MJ Part 1. I knew it was going to be bad because the first part of the book was boring as hell and I couldn't finish reading it. Therefore I went to the theater with low hype. And when the movie was over, I was just like "that was it? really?" these will be your only opinions when the end credits roll. I think splitting books in parts only worked for 'Deathly Hallows' because both of them could stand as single movies , I mean there is more story than setting up the final battle in 'Deathly Hallows Part 1'. I wish there was a 3 hour single Mockingjay film than 2 films. I give 5 for MJ Part 1 because it could be wrapped up in half an hour than forcibly stretched 2 hours.