Amazing adaptation

Rating: 10/10 (18 November 2013)

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire it's a sequel better than the first in every aspect:
ACTING: 10/10
Jennifer Lawrence was amazing, she passed the tension and drama lived for Katniss after the Hunger Games, and now is a traumatized character.
Josh Hutcherson was pretty good too, and had more time to be developed as Peeta, turning the character more profound, with his "disappointments in love".
Another positive point is the supporting cast, Liam Hemsworth proves that he is not just a pretty face surprising as Gale and Donald Sutherland was amazing like ever.
And Jena Malone takes the camera on she as Johanna Mason, she's f*cking amazing.
VISUAL: 9/10
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire had $140 million, while the first had the half of this, so everything is better now, not just CGI, but all the rest, scenarios, setting, garment, this movie is visually amazing.
WRITING: 10/10
The plot is incredible, one of better adaptations ever, everything that's important in the book is in the movie, and what is taken off help the movie to be better.
Even better than a faithful script is the fact that did an faithful atmosphere, the political climate and the criticism for society what made the book amazing (what miss in first movie) was amazing in that movie.
MUSIC: 7/10
The soundtrack was good, but nothing memorable, but work well in the movie.
VERIDICT:
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is incredibly faithful to the book and that excels in all aspects of its predecessor, giving a vote of confidence for director Francis Lawrence who should get the last two movies in the series too.
In addition to opening the eyes of the public for the political and intelligent content from the book written by Collins, showing that Hunger Games deserves more thought that "who gets Katniss?"