LOL...8.2... Are IMDb Users out of there mind.....

Rating: 6/10 (8 December 2013)

First of all, i have been following IMDb for a long time and i do follow the ratings pretty seriously, and for a long time ratings has been my best companion to sort which movies to fell for and which to ignore.
Now about 'Catching Fire', 8.2 rating... enlisted in IMDb all time best 250 movies, i had a great expectation before going to theater.
But i was almost sleeping the entire first half, the reason was not that movie was slow paced, literally speaking i am a big fan of slow movies which have gripping story line and great acting but the 'Catching Fire' lack that X-Factor.
The second half seemed to be filled with Adrenalin which could compensate the failure of first half and movie could end up in high note, but the movie yet again was unable to lift up its vague story line.
In the end I just want to ask the generous users who have shown there utmost generosity for this movie and given the 8+ rating to this film, is this movie has that X-Factor capable of making in IMDb all time best 250 movie ???