. It's quite a sad story when I'm not all up in arms and joy about a movie that involves Middle Earth.

Rating: 4/10 (6 May 2015)

We are at the end of this 'Hobbit' trilogy with 'The Battle of the Five Armies'. The last three years seem to have gone by fairly fast. It seems like yesterday when I was writing about Warner Bros. heading back to Middle Earth with the 'Hobbit'. I was super stoked about it, because I was such a huge fan of the 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy. I think I saw each of those films five times in the theater, owned each version that came out on DVD and Blu-ray, and went back to see them when they were re- released. I just can't get enough of the 'LOTR' films. But shortly after the announcement that we were receiving a 'Hobbit' film, things started going downhill.
Now, 'The Hobbit', written by J.R.R Tolkien is only 320 pages long. The 'LOTR' books were well over 1200 pages long combined. You can do the math yourself, but taking a small 320 page book and splitting it into three long movies is very difficult to get right. Well the end result was less than stellar. There was way too much filler, slow pacing, and everything just kind of fizzles out. With 'Lord of the Rings', Jackson and his crew took their time and made three incredible films.
I am still to this day thrilled, watching 'Return of the King'. It's emotional drama still makes me tear up and the battles are still incredible, along with it's several endings, which are all necessary and beautiful. You really connected to each of those characters in 'LOTR' and even felt that you went on that long and dangerous journey with them. With these 'Hobbit' films, that is definitely not the case. With the first 'Hobbit' movie, it took literally 45 minutes to get out of a young Bilbo's house and start this journey. And even after that, it took another hour to have even a little bit energy. The second film was a bit better, spent some more time with each character and has some fun adventurous action. And most importantly, it finally told us where the story was headed, which was to see the big evil dragon Smaug (voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch).
Part two literally left us hanging on a cliff with Bilbo watching Smaug head to the lake town to destroy it. So what would seem like one of the big climactic scenes of the book, being Smaug destroying the town and then meeting his own fate, happens before the title "The Battle of the Five Armies" appears on screen. And that is a big problem with splitting this book into three long movies. Smaug was one of the coolest and greatest characters in 'The Hobbit' and he didn't get a chance to shine, at least in this third film. Where 'Return of the King' had tons of depth, meaning, and intense action scenes, 'Battle of the Five Armies' did not.
Instead, this third and final film is basically just one long action film, void of any real character development or payoff. Since Smaug is no longer a living dragon, the dwarfs can claim their throne of treasures once again. But this also entices a big powerful orc army to travel to their kingdom to destroy it and use its riches to conquer and kill Middle Earth. So from one fight to the next, we get a straight up action movie. And while we still have these epic large battles where ten-thousand people fight another ten-thousand people, Jackson made the main characters have more intimate fight sequences, which was nice, but again redundant. No character has a transformation in this film. In the 'LOTR' movies, each character went through a rough transformation.
They were not the same people at the beginning of the film as they were at the end. But in these 'Hobbit' films, particularly this final third one, not one person has changed or gone through some difficult transformation. The only character to have a glimpse of change is Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage), who is blinded by the cursed gold in his kingdom, therefore he comes across as a dick. But of course, he has a change of heart, throws off his crown, and becomes the good guy again. And that is the extent of the character development in 'The Hobbit'. Jackson does manage to hint his 'LOTR' trilogy, but it is done in a very small way, which comes across very cheesy, as if Jackson was giving us a big wink several times in a row. And now let us discuss Legolas. You know the blonde elf who is a Jedi ninja with his swords and bow and arrow.
It seems like the studio and Jackson wanted to film a lot of scenes with him trying to have those big cool moments like he did in the 'LOTR' films. But rather than having one of those big moments per film, Jackson added about a dozen of those moments within the span of a half an hour in this 'Hobbit' movie. It completely took the awe and coolness out of each of those moments. Not too mention they were mostly laughable and the CG wasn't perfect. All that being said, the movie as a whole, looks beautiful and was filmed perfectly. The landscapes and epic battle scene shots look very nice. But the performances are solid other than Gandalf (Ian McKellen) and Bilbo (Martin Freeman).
It seems like everyone else was tired of making the film by then. It's quite a sad story when I'm not all up in arms and joy about a movie that involves Middle Earth. But the fact remains is that the studio was so greedy that they ended up having a poor film trilogy in order to make more money. And who suffers? We the fans and audience do.