Why Do Moviegoers Support Bad Films By Paying For Them?

Rating: 1/10 (28 December 2014)

If you watched the first two Hobbit films directed by Jackson, then you know the story arc is on a steep, downward spiral. For example, the previous film was so bad I was actually rooting for the dragon Smaug! I despised the film that much!
But let's talk economics. If you pay to see junk then you, yes you, are encouraging Hollywood to make more junk. It's Economics 101. If you don't spend money on bad films then Hollywood will do a better job. It's that simple. Since the movie-going audience pays the bills, when the movie-going audience stops paying the bills, Hollywood will have a financial incentive to stop making junk!
The movie has little to do with the book except the names are all the same. If you changed every name you would not realize your watching The Hobbit. The film is nothing more than war porn, plain and simple.
The original Lord Of The Rings film trilogy were masterpieces. But can you imagine what the films would have been like if each book in the trilogy was split up into three films each - for a total of 9 films? Well, that's exactly what Director Jackson did. He took one skinny book and instead of turning it into one or possibly two films, he essentially made-up a different story - from the book - and made three films.
Now if Jackson could have done a better job than Tolkien himself, then Great! But he's not a fantasy writing genius, he's a money grubbing moron who wants to maximize profits by using his formerly good name to lure fans of Tolkien to watch his crap. In other words, Jackson does not care one bit that he ruining one of the greatest pieces of literature in the English language. He's making himself and his buddies rich because of you and me!
Every time you spend a dime on something you are voting for that product or service, just like when you vote for a politician at the polls. If you want quality then don't pay for junk! It's that simple!