The Hobbit, because $%&= you Tolkien and $%&= you too Tolkien fans!!!

Rating: Null/10 (9 January 2015)

Let me begin by saying that I went to watch the third part of the trilogy with no hopes whatsoever after watching the insulting adaptations of the first two parts, specially the Desolation of Smaug.
During this last part we are supposed to watch the battle of Dale against Smaug, and the battle of the dwarfs, men and elves against orcs and goblins (which is why it is called the battle of the five armies). But the creators had to continue with the subplots (that "justify" a three movie adaption of a 300 page children's book) that appear in the first two parts which made this third part more confusing and more insulting (and probably some pockets deeper). Some of the subplots are:

The foundation less love triangle among Kili, Legolas and Thauriel. - Thauriel (who does not appear in the book but appears more times in the movie than other characters from the book) - The political battle between the government of Dale and Bard (which sounded to me as a criticism to socialism). - The dwarfs being chased by the orcs. - The battle of Gandalf and the white council against Sauron (although this part was kind of cool, except for the visual effects). - Alfrid (who does not appear in the book but appears more times in the movie than other characters from the book) - The worms. - Legolas (who does not appear in the book but appears more times in the movie than other characters from the book). - The insanity of Thranduil - The insanity of Thorin.

Added to this ridiculous amount of subplots is the fact that they did not even close many of them and leaves people unable to answer the following questions:

Did the elves get their gold? - Did the men get their gold? - Did the dwarfs get their gold? - Did Bilbo get his gold? - How did Saruman handle Sauron? - What became of the people of Dale? - What became of the people of Erebor? - What happened to the worms? (They could have easily destroyed the armies)

All of these stories were represented by using some very bad visual effects which makes people question: Did this movie really come out more than 10 years after the LOTR trilogy, which had awesome visual effects? They even used CGI in scenes were Bard was by himself riding a horse in the open. At this point I am not even sure Dain was CGI made or a real life actor.
It seems to me that this movie was only made to make huge amounts of money and not to honor the wonderful novel that Tolken wrote. If they had put as much effort in the quality of the movie as they did in the LOTR trilogy they would have made good money. It is, once again, a case where industry takes over art.
P.D. I am not even going to mention the fact that Beorn and the eagles appear for like 15 seconds during the movie.
P.D. At least there were no sexual jokes.