Re 3D 48fps version - screwy

Rating: 5/10 (17 December 2012)

We went along to the cinema having been given tickets by someone who couldn't go. Turned out we were going to see the 3D version filmed in 48 frames per second (fps). This is an apparent improvement. I'd say it was detrimental to the enjoyment of the film (I could see that in the normal, 2D version it would have been a fine experience).
Basically, this version made us feel a little queasy, altogether uneasy and question our eyes - or our glasses - and seemed to give the film a "hand-held camera" quality.
I have enjoyed 3d in the past with films such as Avatar and Coraline, but not here. Wasn't for me.