The Hobbit - an unexpected movie

Rating: 4/10 (30 July 2013)

If the Lord of the Rings was still a decent fantasy with a decent rhythm, The Hobbit surprises us with a stunning dilation of times worthy of Angelopoulos. In a desperate attempt to make 3 movies out of a 200 pages booklet, Peter Jackson and his disturbing writers, after adding all the things to be inserted to lengthen the stock, have come to use eternal shots and endless pursuits in a land barren and sterile to fill this movie.
Seriously, despite all the additions, there is so little to say that we have to spend 40 minutes watching movies about dwarfs who run, dwarfs that are hidden, dwarfs who eat: it seemed the Great Brother: Lord of the Rings edition.
The proof of the actors is fair/low, costumes and special effects are decent, but not superb, while the dwarfs are dwarfs highest and most beautiful in the history of fantasy ... Over this, the plot is so weak that it's a real trial to face the movie without failing to sleep.
If you add that this ordeal lasts 3 hours (when many of the excellent fantasy of the 80s in 120 minutes told us all and more), you can well understand how anyone could give a resounding 4!
I do not recommend seeing it, but if you want to embark, find something else to do during the movie (I know, ironing, a game on I-Pad, working on PC ...), otherwise you will feel like a thief took away 3 hours of your life.
P.S. as always good Peter has not taken off some "enemy that crack like an idiot," to annihilate the little amount of credibility that the film could have maintained.