Hated HFR 3D version - should have tried the 2D 24fps version

Rating: 5/10 (20 January 2013)

The HFR (High Frame Rate) version of the Hobbit was simply terrible - it looked as if it had been shot with a cheap video-camera.
There's no way I'll be watching either of the sequels in HFR. I'm hoping that when these films are produced at 24fps, this unwelcome technology doesn't adversely affect 'the filmic look' that we should all be able to enjoy. Not sure that I can justify the luxury of going to see the 2D 24fps version of An Unexpected Version just to see if it looks 'better'.
Now what happens when it gets to DVD/BluRay is anyone's guess. Worst case is that they try to keep the looks of the high frame rate version. Please give us the option to choose either 'the filmic look' or the 'the video-camera look'.
Update: 16th Feb 2013
On purely scientific grounds, I took the opportunity to watch the film again in 2D at the traditional 24fps. This time, it looked as it should.
High frame rate - never again, particularly for this genre of film.