Magnificent but not Mystifying

Rating: 8/10 (2 January 2013)

First off, I'm a big fan of the LOTR series and had high expectations for the prequel.
The Good: The intro is done differently than the book, and is better .
Flashbacks concisely tell back stories in a way that is engaging, intriguing, and overall mesmerizing.
(SLIGHT SPOILER) The section from when they introduce Radagast to when they venture out of Rivendell not only is the tightest cut section, but also uniquely sets "The Hobbit" in motion for the next 2 movies as well as connects back to the story of LOTR.
The Bad: After the title, the 10 minute section that drills in that this is a sequel to LOTR is unnecessary and boring! The details later take care of this, and would cut down the much complained about run time.
The makers focused more on staying true to the book rather than adapting it for the screen. Showing instead of telling, combining plot points, and pacing all feel and look more like a visual rendering of the book instead of what could have been one of the best adaptations of all time.
The LOTR has my favorite orchestral soundtrack to any movie. Each have the same themes, but have new additions for each one and different performances. The Hobbit relied too heavily on rehashed versions of the "Song of the Lonely Mountain" and these themes instead of presenting something new.
Conclusion: A satisfying movie for fan boys and fantasy fanatics, but not a cinematic gem. B