Peter Jackson does everything opposite of what he did in The Lord of The Rings , plus the director still has credit.

Rating: 7/10 (19 September 2016)

Peter Jackson returns to adapt the classic Tolkien, after adapting brilliantly to The Lord trilogy of the Rings, now he will adapt the book The Hobbit, plus it already wrong in wanting to do three movies, a book that had material in maximum 2 films, in my opinion 2 movies was good size, and could be 2 great movies, the more he preferred to questionable 3 movies (I admit I found the trilogy in sí, good), the cast was well chosen, Martin Freeman does a good Bilbo Baggins, who in my opinion is a better character than Frodo, Ian McKellen back to Gandalf, Richard Armitage, is perhaps the best character in the film, Thorin Oakenshield, Ken Stott, Graham McTavish, etc., the cast is good, everyone is well, the Hobbit trilogy, uses a lot of CGI, something that the Lord of the Rings trilogy not used with such excess, this film is very green screen, has some moments that is understandable, plus other think not had need, the film is visually beautiful, the soundtrack is good, the costumes are great, the script is problematic, if only 2 films, or even one, surely it would be better, have a great time, I quite liked the introduction of the film, the battle scenes are good, more the Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is just a good movie, what it is disappointing compared will trilogy the Lord of the Rings. Note 7.8