Does not pass the Tarantino Standards test

Rating: 10/10 (2 January 2016)

A HUGE Tarantino fan here.
This movie does not meet the criteria of a good Tarantino film. This movie is also a very bad western
1. The original score is bland and minimalist.
2. We all know Tarantino loves Leone, so at least I expected it to be an epic western, which it certainly is not. It is a theater play.
3. The characters are NOT believable at all. Bunch of evil bloodthirsty cowboys are not supposed to be so chatty like teen girls.
4. The music is really bad, Tarantino used to include good music in his films
5. There is no statically placed camera that just observes what is happening from an odd angle (like Mr White and Mr Pink's conversation in the toilet of the warehouse in Reservoir Dogs) nor there is a out-of-control situation shaky camera like the one in Pulp Fiction's overdose scenes. He is now filming his movies like a sugary poppy Hollywood director.
6. There is no enough sharpness and contrast in the picture
7. There is disgusting imagery of male nudity and even more disgusting detailed description of male to male sexual contact
8. Characters singing is a thing Tarantino often does, and most of the time does well, but the song he chose for Jennifer to sing, was really boring
9. He used TOO MUCH dialogue this time, too much!
10. Death Proof was much more entertaining than this - the viewer hangs out with good looking girls at a nice bar, then some road action with muscle cars happens. None of that here - a ragtag gang in a boring saloon, and then the most unnecessary violence occurs. 11. The ending was really stupid and unbelievable.
All in all extremely bad execution, disgusting, unbelievable characters, boring story, bad violence, not spectacular to watch, not spectacularly directed like PF or Kill Bill, nothing beautiful to lay your eyes on, nothing good to listen to.
Upsides were good acting and some subtle things in the direction and screen writing.