Perhaps Tarantino's worst to date

Rating: 5/10 (25 June 2016)

All the trite Tarantino elements are there - the disjointed timeline, the swish dialog, the gory edge, the relentless trails of vengeance. But the film never really satisfies. Not a single scene brings you to look forward to the next scene; The count of graphically busted human organs is exasperatingly boring in relation to how it helps propel the story and convey the ambiance; The suspense of disbelief is never properly established as you're launched into the fantastically impossible world the story takes place in (just to give an idea, Django and Inglorious Bastards are near historical documentaries in comparison to this film's world).
The outcome - A superficial, irresponsible exercise by a director who seem to be engorged by the notion of testing the extent to which his audiences are willing to embrace his work, regardless of it's content.
And to add to all this sham, nothing is new here: Lock up a few men with guns in a single room, give them all intermittent chances of play, and shuffle the odds as best fits, was already done, successfully, cleverly and masterfully, by Tarantino himself, in Reservoir Dogs. Do yourself a favor and watch that movie (again and again) for the best that Tarantino delivered, and avoid this disrespectful piece of populist cinema - most likely the worst that Tarantino have mustered so far.