What a Complete Waste of Space this Film Would be Even Just Left on the Cutting Room Floor!!

Rating: 1/10 (6 March 2016)

I think this film was very, very nasty and it was absolutely horrifying considering the movie theater trailers portrayed it to be some kind of a Western. Surprise! It's probably four or five times more bloody and disturbing than the movie Scream. In my opinion, it is twice as inappropriate as Sin City. So, the filmmakers and directors deserve zero stars for releasing advertising for a movie that attracted countless young children with their parents who probably would not walk out of a movie with their kids out of guilt. In my theater alone there were about ten families with small kids, and I could not have felt any worse for both the children and the parents who found out they were sitting in some kind of NC-17 movie that barely broke the limit for R Ratings. I think growing up and seeing every R rated movie besides horror films known to America from a young age, I do think there was ever an R Rated movie I ever saw between 1990 and 2005 that was ever this bad. So I think the studio itself made an error funding a movie this drastically disgusting and despicable, and I think movies like this are absolutely criminal when they are advertised as R Rated Westerns and become a giant bomb of cheap crap full of profanity to the horror of the ticket purchasers and the guilt of parents, and the plight to children. That being said about the advertising, I do feel I would not have really cared about just a movie that was extremely shady in not having a moral compass at all in any place or small scene if it was advertised that way at all (and I mean at all!) because I have nothing against watching movies like Kill Bill or even Sin City if you know when you buy your tickets that your movie is going to push the R rating to the limit and the moral obligations of anyone at all involved in the release of direction. I think in terms of the moral obligation, I think many reviews have said in the papers and the internet that the critics writing them are not sure if QT has a moral compass at all now. I heartily agree and I think that even the actors themselves have lost my respect for making this movie at all. Number one, I think that they should feel guilt themselves about the way they knew they were signing up for a Western holiday hit that was going to be a bomb of filth and disgust to the shock of their audience. I do not hold it against Bruce Willis or other great actors in Sin City that they were going to be in a pretty nasty movie because they were not participating in a cloak and dagger roller coaster that was not going to be properly advertised, but I definitely hold it against these actors themselves for participating in a perverted movie of this highest degree knowing they were hoping for a big hit and would not tell the audience before seeing it that it really is more gross in many respects than a very nasty horror movie. Additionally, I think the movie fails miserably in having any appeal as basically a movie about the satisfaction of slaughter because it does not even have the thrill of a horror movie experience because it is too grotesque and openly miserable. There is no cheap fun at all even if you are just wanting to see a scary movie, it's basically all about how QT was determined to make a movie that is ultimately about sickened and idiotic bimbos having all the credit in the world for cutting of human limbs and essentially not having moral compasses. So there are two layers of extreme wrong in this film in the horrible advertising versus the real reality of the film and then the theme that fails miserably to even fit into a film genre like thrillers that don't have any sense besides people getting killed. It doesn't make that cut because the killers in this movie are just masturbating in their violence instead of out for predatory or spiritual evil in a way that would make sense. However, the movie continues to fail dreadfully beyond those two unforgivable movie shortfalls. The movie is so, so, so boring. There are literally at least four or five scenes in the movie where you could easily fall asleep and are about three times longer than a scene needs to be to have a sense of real passing or even keep the interest of the audience. So the pacing is the worst I think I have ever seen in a movie. Beyond that, I also must say the violence itself is ultimately extremely repulsive and very sick. A woman likes shooting boogies out of her nose in the movie. She gets beat up by the men throughout the film and her death in the movie is basically trumpeted like a celebration itself. In all honesty, I think I could gladly give up on America just for supporting movies that use the inane slaughter of a woman as it's final joyous climax in a way that shows two numskulls deciding to not kill her with a bullet but let her hang as they enjoy pulling up her hanging rope as they miserably watch her and then masturbate on their bed in a pool of blood. I think it would have been a much better decision to spend my time watching a movie about a documentary of woman being stoned to death in the middle east than watch this movie. Ultimately, I vowed never to watch another QT movie ever again, and I also decided to never watch his original movies I have never seen. This film is only pure trash and filth.