Lazy and Bad

Rating: 1/10 (27 March 2016)

On the first part of the IMDb page for this movie they have the following:
Anachronisms (9) | Continuity (11) | Errors in geography (2) | Factual errors (5) | Miscellaneous (3) | Plot holes (1) | Revealing mistakes (3) | Spoilers (4)
Except for the spoilers that is a list of basic errors and it speaks towards how bad this movie really is.
Here is my hypothesis as to why Tarantino has put out so many stinkers. At some point Tarantino was praised for the dialogue in his flicks and for sure there were some great back and forth between characters and even some great monologues. This however, is not one of those flicks.
Because of that mindset I believe his movies for the most part now are ego driven, pretentious garbage barges. There is no reason for the movie to be as long as it was and it isn't for any high ideals like not wanting to leave work on the editing floor it is simply this- Tarantino feels his cinematic prowess is so great we are going to love minute after minute of O.B. yelling at the horses, or the horse hooves stepping in to the snow. Or actors stealing glances at each other. I can imagine Tarantino and his lackeys yelling CUT!! and then patting themselves on the back for filming footfalls in the snow or two men struggling against a wind machine to lay out some rope to the outhouse which is where they should have left that horribly painful sequence. Utter pretentious nonsense.
In short, Tarantino got away with wacky dialogue and interesting cinematic displays because in those movies where he received praise they fit and the dialogue for example was part of a good movie. You know I am right- You can forgive the pretentious "look at me" cinematic bloviating when the movie is good or great. This movie wasn't and therefore his self congratulatory garbage is unacceptable. The movie is sooo long and there were many times I uttered "oh for GD sake stoppit!!"
Anyhow, I didn't like the movie-I don't like that someone like Tarantino putting out movies that the film world adores because they think they are supposed to enjoy it. It was a long movie with a boring premise, you kept waiting for something to happen and most importantly it was a long time to listen to a bunch of late 1880s cowboys using words and overly long sentences in a period where most were just regular men who said regular things with no concept of pretentious look at me directors.
Seriously- utter garbage- even with the over the top cartoonish violence was ridiculous especially the post coffee sequence. It just feels like yeah, its been done, stop making movies that are just revisits of previous recipes. Tarantino will go down as one of those directors that should have stopped after his first few successes. A good John Wayne Western stands the test of time as does a Clint Eastwood movie and even spaghetti Westerns stand up- this won't. Seriously the following is just one of many reasons this movie is garbage go check it out it will show you how lazy it is and how he is spending so much time concentrating on his previous 'done goods' that he failed to do some basic research and editing.
Anachronisms (9)+ Continuity (11) + Errors in geography (2) + Factual errors (5)+ Miscellaneous (3) + Plot holes (1) + Revealing mistakes (3) - Spoilers (4)= big fat zero of a movie.