I am offended by pretentious reviewers/comments

Rating: 1/10 (17 June 2008)

1. I have an attention span 2. I like ALL other M. Night movies 3. I hated The Happening
The biggest laugh, the greatest joke here, is that M Night has stated in interviews that HE WAS TRYING TO MAKE A B-MOVIE.
In other words... The Happening is INTENTIONALLY BAD. The acting, the editing, the pace, all of it was intentionally hokey. The problem here though... is that no one got it. I'm not going to lie like most reviewers and say I knew, it didn't click with me until M Night stated it was his attempt at a B-movie.
So all those armchair critics trying to pretend this film was deep and high-art must have their heads up way, way, up their own rectums.
If having an imagination means making a worthless movie more than it is, then yeah, I must not have an imagination.
Furthermore, Ebert is a old pretentious gas bag who is just as clueless. His review only states the obvious of ALL of M Night's films. If you haven't figured out by now that M Night is more focused on the human condition and how it reacts to odd or strange events rather than the event itself, then you need to quit watching movies.
To summarize Ebert, {not verbatim} "This movie is not a summer mindless blockbuster and explores how these people deal in a crisis"... wow Ebert... um, which M Night movie are we talking about again?
Go ahead and try to be deep about this one... you'll only look foolish.