Is there any point to this movie?

Rating: 3/10 (8 November 2013)

I really don't know why they even bothered with this movie? It seemed to be so far away from the originality of the first two in this trilogy that it seemed to simply exist to tie up a couple of lose ends that really didn't need to be tied up. Granted, the second movie was a carbon copy of the first movie, but the fact that it was a carbon copy, and also was set in Bangkok, and brought out the sleazy nature of Bangkok, actually gave it some charm. This movie had absolutely none of that.
In this film Doug gets kidnapped because it turns out that Chow has stolen a bunch of gold off of an American Crime lord and the wolf pack is the only ones who can get their hands on them. As such what they seem to be attempting to do is to throw the woefully unequiped and inadequate Wolfpack into a scenario that they manage to stumble through once again. However, the thing that set the other two movies apart – the fact that they cannot remember a thing and must spend the entire movie piecing their fragmented memories back together, is gone, and because they take that away, this movie becomes nothing special.
Further, part two seriously pushed the boundaries of what can be considered to be acceptable in a modern movie (such as the full frontal shots of the Ladyboys, which as it turns out, aren't even edited in certain versions). Okay, I am not really impressed with that, but this film was so much tamer, and in a way, quite dull, pointless, and probably should never have been made.