Save your money and watch the first again.

Rating: 2/10 (18 October 2011)

Wow. I knew the premise was the same as the first film, but I didn't know that the entire thing was going to be the same. From the setup to the structure to even some of the most minor details, almost every single thing about this was just the exact same as the first. I'm having a very hard time thinking of a more lazily written film. The first one was a lot of fun the first time (decreased significantly after the first viewing, but still) and so this one wasn't a hard watch by any means, but the entire time it was just so obvious that they thought they could turn in the same thing and get the same kind of explosive results. Unbelievably lazy, really embarrassing stuff.