The only review you need to read

Rating: 8/10 (30 May 2011)

OK I've decided to throw in my review, since I'm reading and reading about people whining how this film has not revolutionized entertainment instead of relying on the same principles as the first part, giving it sometimes one star out of ten?? (Come on, how miserable can you be to rate a film that people laugh their bums off watching with one star).
To said reviewers: Seriously, this is HANGOVER PART II. It's called that for a reason, what did you expect, for the director to try reinvent the wheel? It's like expecting Jurassic Park 2 to take place in 2011 with fake dinosaurs.
OK, let's go back to our short review.
For people who didn't watch the first part (Do they even exist? If so, please go and watch it first, it's awesome), this is the principle that both films are based on: characters suffer from an extreme hangover caused by mixing drugs and alcohol, they also lose memory of the last night's events and try to backtrack their steps by following small clues. Hilarity ensues. That's it, no more, no less.
Regarding "child exploitation joke" which some female reviewer wrote a wall of text about (one joke mind you, 10 seconds screen time) as far as I know problem's not with the movie but with Thailand. Period. This is a film for mature audiences that can take it for what it is, a comedy movie and means of entertainment.
Saying that, there are some hilarious moments on screen, in terms of sequels... Well it's one of the best comedy sequels I watched. Go and see this film with your friends. I guarantee you will have a great time.