without Tom, it's a piece of rubbish...

Rating: 5/10 (20 April 2000)

Even with Tom, this film is only slightly better than sh*t. They can concentrate it into a 100-120 minutes long film. 190 minutes is way too much. I don't mind films being long, but the minutes must be "solid".
And This film uses an old man to bring out this story, too much like the "Titanic" uses an old lady, it's stupid here...
And someone said it's a movie with depth, I simply can't see any, sorry....