This movie is a embarrassing.

Rating: Null/10 (9 December 2014)

Awful, awful movie that doesn't warrant the time it would take to point out all that makes it suck.
Some key points: The movie tries desperately in every single scene without exception to be...I don't know...cool...in the way the first two movies are. The amber lighting...people sitting around eating cannoli...the raspy voices..."Joey ZAZA", really??, etc. And how many times can the cast say the name Joey Zaza? It should be a drinking game. The dialogue most often borders on absurd. After Michael's "confession" to the priest, why is Connie bringing up 'Fredo? Where did that even come from except for a cheap gratuitous explanation of her understanding of his death.
Why does the movie end with the same music used throughout Raging Bull?
Why is GEORGE HAMILTON in this movie?
Why did Coppola insist on using his daughter then dubbing in someone else's voice? How is that OK?
The plot is absurd. The Vatican wouldn't come to a NY organized crime family for money. Every scene with Talia Shire is unnecessarily dramatic and out of character for Connie.
The list goes on. It's unwatchable.
But you should watch it anyway. Because according to these reviews, there's something about it that doesn't suck. After watching it 4 times and wanting to love it, I have no idea what that is. This movie is a mistake.