absolutely abysmal

Rating: 3/10 (28 March 2013)

I so wanted to give this film 1/10 as its so bad, but had i not seen the first two i probably would have thought it an OK film.
But, i have seen the first two, and based on those cinema master-pieces, who wouldn't watch III? Right from the start of III i couldn't believe how bad this film was - the acting, almost comedic at times, the settings, the clothes - the film is supposed to be 1979, yet it looks 1990 to me when the film is made. Absolutely appalling film and i cannot believe it has the same director.
Those of you have rated this film highly, or say its the best of the trilogy, are very very misguided people.