An "ok-movie"

Rating: Null/10 (11 August 2005)

Lets be frank. It really wasn't easy for Coppola and Puzo to write a story that was as good as the two previous movies. This is not like the lord of the rings, were a great story was already written down. No, they had to invent a totally new story. And they did a good job. The story alone was good, but not at the same league as the others.
But is was a good ending for the trilogie.
The ending of this movie is in my eyes one of the best endings ever made in movie history.
The acting was great. And of course Pacino carried the movie. He was just perfect.
The movie would have been a lot better if Tom Hagen was still in the picture. Michael really needed his concilliery.
The acting of Sofia Coppola? Well, it was just plain awful. She is better behind the camera then in front of it.