7.7? Maybe I missed something...

Rating: Null/10 (23 April 2017)

This is a very silly and unusual film, actually saying it is unusual is an understatement. In its own bizarre way it showed something that resembled a plot and its saving the world, how original right?
I won't criticize the special effects because it was the 90s and CGI of today is nowhere near the CGI in this film. So its fair to say its not aged too well in that department.
This film was a bizarre and jumbled mess. It was quirky and silly and an absolute waste of 2 hours. The acting is still good because of Bruce Willis and Mila, Bruce Willis? What was he thinking? The future looked unrealistic and unattractive. We also had a very odd performance from Chris Rock which I do not know what to make off except he was very annoying.
The viewership and people who assign ratings is an interesting one. They assigned the same score, 7.7, to Titanic which was an incredible film that won almost every Oscar, a fan favorite. How do you explain the rationale for rating this jumbled mess with no awards to its name a 7.7?