How the hell the AMPAS could possibly waste the 4 most important Oscars to this piece of crap

Rating: 1/10 (22 January 2013)

No offense but it is so obvious that TD is far worse than IA: from the plot, the directing to camera and story-telling. The original lasts for less than 2h and it blows audiences' mind with intense and unexpected twists. This one has more than 2h and a half and the best it can do is re-telling the original'story without any improvements but even worse. I fell asleep after half of the film. The characters are very poor- developed. Leo's and Matt's character get the top-rank position in about 4 months?! I mean come on, are you kidding me? We're not kids to be fooled like that. In IA, Yan and Ming in IA took almost 10 years to earn their credibility in the workplace. Yan had to work undercover for many bosses and live the life of a true criminal: assaulting, drugging and killing. Not just hanging around and beating up some guys like Leo did. And since when a just graduated-fish like Matt's guy can become an inspector in matter of months. My goodness! Also, why was that stupid screen writer so fond of swearing? He made all character say bad words in every line of the script. This makes the movie sound cheap and low. Next time, if you want to look cool and play smart, stay out of dirty words please! You guys made Mark's character like a psycho when swearing every 5s and screaming like an idiot. Well, I guess that Academy Award Best Supporting Actor was to reward his ability to swear consistently in this stupid film. Shame on the AMPAS!
I give 1/10 to Mr Scorsese for stealing the idea of another film and claiming that he were only inspired by it. Yeah, congratulations! He had earned Oscar for that.