the movie focused much on the special effect that made the it an obvious fantasy

Rating: 6/10 (6 November 2005)

effects was very good!!. setting- near realistic but not quite. me as a director not much appreciate the actors acts!! the suddenly appearance of the disaster was not appropriate. many hole to contradiction to the real world can come out. a good copy of new york was made. i heard no music!! it has no theme song to give more power to the movie!! in fairness there is no big time actor there! the wolves were very good in acting! thanks for the graphics it made it better. effects was very good!!. setting- near realistic but not quite. me as a director not much appreciate the actors acts!! the suddenly appearance of the disaster was not appropriate. many hole to contradiction to the real world can come out. a good copy of new york was made. i heard no music!! it has no theme song to give more power to the movie!! in fairness there is no big time actor there! the wolves were very good in acting! thanks for the graphics it made it better.effects was very good!!. setting- near realistic but not quite. me as a director not much appreciate the actors acts!! the suddenly appearance of the disaster was not appropriate. many hole to contradiction to the real world can come out. a good copy of new york was made. i heard no music!! it has no theme song to give more power to the movie!! in fairness there is no big time actor there! the wolves were very good in acting! thanks for the graphics it made it better.effects was very good!!. setting- near realistic but not quite. me as a director not much appreciate the actors acts!! the suddenly appearance of the disaster was not appropriate. many hole to contradiction to the real world can come out. a good copy of new york was made. i heard no music!! it has no theme song to give more power to the movie!! in fairness there is no big time actor there! the wolves were very good in acting! thanks for the graphics it made it better.