Stood the test of time

Rating: 9/10 (17 September 2019)

The main argument for those who do not like this movie is that its not scientifically accurate. Is Nolan's Interstellar scientifically accurate? Is Kubrick's 2001 accurate? Even the most accurate Sci-fi, Contact, is not that accurate.
This is not a documentary, but even if it was, some people still do not "believe" in climate change, others don't believe humans are causing it. Scientists have been saying this since the 70s, but false "belief" is the cancer of human civilisation. So, this movie was trying to exaggerate the impact of climate change in the hope this idea can eventually penetrate some thick skulls.
Surprise, surprise, a good portion of what is in this movie (the sever hurricanes, flooding and winter vortex) has been happening in the past 15 years since its release, albeit a lot slower. Who knows, maybe the rest will occur in the future.
I go back to watch this movie every few months. There are scenes that feel just nice, like that fire in the library or the camping in the frozen kitchen, and for the most part it is quite entertaining. I admit there is some redundant storylines like that ill boy, but hey, nothing is perfect.