Dark Knight shot in daylight

Rating: 5/10 (7 August 2008)

This movie was a complete turn around from Movie 1. Movie 1 has darkness, grace and sense of awe. The second movie was choppily edited, bad continuity errors such as bike driving into mall scene where it approaches window to smash through then cuts to scene where it hasn't even got near glass. Im thinking who edited this! The worst thing of all was the choice of daylight scenes all the time as opposed to the dark look of the first movie. Gotham might as well be Chicago, we saw no CGI strange skyscrapers and no monorail system. It looked too normal and helicopter shots of buildings looking sunny. Wheres the dirty gritty feel? No new weapons, no secret weapons that could kill everyone. The main character just uses standard guns, rockets and TNT, oh yes and some dogs. Wow. Real imagination being used here, not! No flashback scenes to show Batman in training years, no references to his youth and wrestling with his past... no references to the Jokers past or flashbacks to how he became who he really is now with his cut mouth. All just skipped past.
I was left thinking Mr Nolan, is this really you directing this. It could easily looked like any other movie out there.
I did enjoy the movie but its a pale 5 out of 10 compared to the first movie. A lot of catching up to do in the next one. Its a bit like the matrix, how do you top it. Well at least you try... not relax and start to get lazy.