OK movie, but Top 100 movies?

Rating: 5/10 (8 August 2008)

Are U all kidding me? Should this be considered to be one of the top 100 movies of all times? Personally I regret seeing this crap in the theater. It would have been more suitable as a decent "sunday-hangover-movie".
I must however confess that Heath Ledger is stunning in his interpretation of "The Joker", probably one of the best movie-screen villains so far, but then he is the only good thing in this movie.
Let me break it down for y'all:
The fights sucks big time: I've seen better fight scenes on baywatch (when Mitch Buchannon takes up shootfighting). They are to short, to "blurred" and there are only like five of 'em in the entire 2.5 hour long movie.
The acting is mediocre: Apart from Ledger the entire cast is totally underachieving. Christian Bale just reminds me of Keanu Reeves (2 facial expressions throughout the entire movie) and the great Michael Cain is in my opinion starting to get tiresome to watch as the kind, tired and concerned butler.
As far as the storyline goes it might as well have been created out of a predefined Hollywood mold (which it is for sure). The dark troubled antihero who is starting to doubt his purpose, the love triangle that "shakes the foundation" of our heroes believes (Spiderman anybody?) and the creation and renewal of new gear and gadgets to satisfy all the "techno/scifi-freaks" out there. So gdm simple and uncreative its truly laughable but then what can one expect from a simple superhero movie?
The only reason this movie gets a 5 out of 10 from me is its potential as a enjoyable "hangovermovie" the good cinematography and Ledgers performance.
Ps. Would be fun to count the number of times "terrorist" or "terrorism" is mentioned in the movie? Or perhaps the number of times Ledger emphasizes how much "havoc you can create with just a couple of barrels of gas and some dynamite". Feels a lot like propaganda in my book.