I'm sure to stay longing for your next film, Ron.

Rating: 7/10 (24 May 2006)

However I love director Ron Howard, my favorite one, I don't like to mark him better than he had done. I wonder if it was related to something about the locating, nope it wasn't; it was a result to face to challenge such a bigger project or something like that. You had been enthusiastic a bit, or rather to say, you had been discouraged maybe. You had not kept a balance. You lost so-called "Tension and Relief." The original book is quite great and the script has been done so-so, however, Mr. Director, may I ask that it made me think "you had been disturbed by somebody?" I didn't see your skills somehow. The heroin, after all, was the unsuccessful. I have expected her very much. But it is the result, which is regrettable. Has she something wrong in her privacy? Or has you some by yourself, Ron? When I was asked who can make that best-seller, "The Da Vinci Code" into film, I thought you'd be the best. Eventually we had needed an Orson Welles for this sort. I guess a Hitchcock would be available anyway. It is what the book wants, isn't it. On just running around, you could not convey that noble story to the audience, We have very few scenes which they halt; it is the point of the failure, Ron. I should say one thing more that someone would remake this book in the feature. Begins in Paris; in the Leuvre; pictures of Leonaldo; and Jesus Christ had been in love..., with these marvelous stuff, you have finished them with just running wild. Oh, Christ might cry, Ron.