Not so fast Sony

Rating: 10/10 (2 November 2006)

This movie was sued in the federal Court of second circuit in New York. Challenge that the court use the very same bible to swear on that the law suit was brought under. A motion was also filed to remove a Jewish Judge with special interest ties. The suit was dismissed for lack of argument of law. The Plaintiff Sirrano Keith Baldeo of New York brought the suit against Sony, Dan Brown, Tom Hanks etc. Alleged that the movie makers never in the trailer or other wise stated the it was fiction and that co producer Dan Brown stated to a judge (peter smith) that he had historical evidence to show that Jesus did have sex with this sinner and had children, the Church hid it. If you notice the movie never stated it was fiction because it wanted to leave it as an 'option' to believe it. The plaintiff is appealing to the Supreme Court. Either way when Jesus were here, there were people and judges just as these. Using his father's name, as they are now doing his (in the courts) and ruling against him with laws they made up. The constitution was suppose to protect a persons right to religious freedom not suppress it if they make a claim in the name the practice there of. When you look at the big picture, weather Fact or Fiction mocking God and creating offenses like this is a sin, (that which is considered Holy is defiled). Those who do it and those who stand idle by and those who make excuses that it is nothing will receive the same judgement.