Terrifying, Belief - shaking, Provoking  a dangerous movie ... if you are Ned Flanders.

Rating: 2/10 (3 January 2007)

This is merely hot air, just as the novel it's based upon and it's author in general. It is not thrilling for a dime and it's performed really bad. Shame if you see the premier-league-cast wasted here. All those brilliant actors and actresses directed to perform on groundlevel. The explanation of the conspiracy hidden in the artwork is one for elementary-school-kids; okay, that's basically the novel's fault too. Those who opposed this film for religious reasons must *imho* ask themselves if their pattern of faith is really such a solid one to enrich their lifes (as it should be) or rather narrowing it down if their belief gets disturbed by such an unsubstantial discounter-heresy. Sorry, no offense given... The entire movie as a statement about confessions, religion and history is totally pointless. It's neither a valuable source to trigger a religion-based argument nor even a decent discussion about theological perspectives. The provoking" theories shown here are as such nothing new and apart of that actually shouldn't tremble no one's faith. Even IF Jesus had a woman (or even if he was a woman): so what? Relax for Christ's sake!!! If you wanna be entertained and provoked decently, watch Dogma", contrary to this it's good and smart (and funny). Vaya con Dios.