Some find it a near excellent sequel

Rating: 1/10 (18 October 2008)

Newman is not to blame for this rubbish; he is innocent. The cast is interestingthere's Mrs. Mastrantonio, who seemed a very interesting and certainly sexy actress; she made movies with Costner, with Dafoe. I do not know anymore if she undresses in this movie; I remember her tits from the Dafoe flick.
COLOR  is as boring and stupid as a Scorsese movie can be. Why all this Ebertian and Kaelian propaganda in Scorsese's favor? There is an assumption that Newman was a widely respected, very admired, cherished, highly regarded actoruniversally; irresistible; enormously popular. That he was universally respected and everybody's idol and cultactor. Yet reading the comments of many competent movie buffs ,one sees that ,if Brando seems universally detestedeven hatedNewman is utterly indifferent to most writersjust like B. Reynolds or M. Douglasor Redford, Cruise, etc.he just ain't there. No traces of interest for him. He is not even moderately respected. He is not very popular with the true movie buffs.
The Scorsese rubbish is all the more negatively significant as it's wholly indifferent even to committed Newman fanslike my mother. This is the NEWMAN MOVIE for those who ignore Newman . (If an imbecile is going to show you that he knows and admires Newman, he will select COLOR .)Of course Scorsese had to pollute another popular culture topicthe Felson. He had to mess this one too. He made it again several yrs. later with Max Cady. Scorsese is addicted to polluting cultural topics .
I have never made it through this whole movie (--the same for CASABLANCA and for the Garbo CAMELIAS).