Ruined by the camera....again

Rating: 1/10 (5 August 2007)

Okay, so the plot of the last Bourne was good -- who could see what was going on, unless you wanted to count the pock marks on the actor's faces. Paul filmed this one even worse. Why waste money on action sequences that no one can see? I despise film critics for encouraging this form of film degradation. They call it inspiring and cutting edge.. but it is crappy and amateurish, readily more disturbing than having a two-year-old sitting behind you and kicking the seat for the entire two hours. I've yet to meet anyone who liked the way either of these movies were filmed. I own the first Bourne and would loved to have had them all...but not if they are not even watchable. You'd do as well to catch the audio and listen to this on tape.