Ridiculous.

Rating: 3/10 (1 October 2007)

I cannot believe this film has scored so highly. It's not terrible, but it's absolutely not worthy of an 8, and while I've seen a lot of really strangely rated movies here, this one's really hard to believe.
1. It's the SAME MOVIE. Have you seen the first one? It was good. The second one? Decent. This one? NOTHING NEW.
2. Did you watch the camera? Apparently the budget couldn't support TRIPODS. Even cameramen who weren't either on speed or suffering severe withdrawal were apparently nowhere to be found. There's something to be said for using the camera to affect a mood; it can't be said here, though, with a straight face.
Such an uninspired movie with such a predictable plot should be enjoyed with popcorn and plenty of salt, NOT hoisted up with the top-ranked movies on this site.