The camera work was a total DISASTER!!!

Rating: 1/10 (4 August 2007)

Either there was a constant stream of earthquakes during the shooting of the film, or the cameraman was an epileptic (or 90 yrs old).
Just horrible.
Snapshots and flickering light - no story, no connection. Like a bad bad, and I mean, BAD undergrad experimental video for a class.
It was probably shot with a camera phone, too.
The last Bond film was a PG rated action movie too, but what a world of difference! You don't need a trembling camera to convey you the drama of a chase, or the tension of a killing. It takes good acting and good screenplay, which this Bourne film was totally without.
Utterly disappointing...