Full of Hollywood clichés ; awful camera-work, very weak movie

Rating: 2/10 (18 August 2007)

I find it deeply disturbing and deeply suspicious that this obviously very weak movie has so many good reviews and so high rating. What's indicative, if you skip about 10 pages, there are many very negative review that, imho, correctly reflect. But first pages are all full of praise.
This move has about the right balance of awful camera work and awful screenplay, full of Hollywood clichés.
I can't find other explanation to this rating other than it's artificially made by the interested parties.
Incidentally, when I was checking the ratings of several movies currently running in my local theater, about 4 of them had rating more than 8. Which is highly unusual and suspicious already by itself, without even seeing them.
Seeing these reviews and this rating, I'm pretty sure IMDb is now "infiltrated". Anything else would be conspiracy theory. Don't believe me? go and see this movie.