Completely Ruined By Cheap & Shaky Camera-work!

Rating: 3/10 (17 August 2007)

I seriously can't understand who could hire that Greengrass guy again to direct another part of the Bourne franchise, really! This movie is again almost UNWATCHABLE because of an totally annoying, constantly shaking, zooming, whirling, jittery camera "style" which only made me angry and nothing else. Is it so hard to get a decent camera guy? Why use your hyperactive 2 year old kid for the task? Or buy a tripod, for God's sake! This is an insult to the senses of every paying moviegoer. Who approved this visual catastrophe? Didn't the producers watch the movie before the release? This could really have been a great movie like the first one, directed by a REAL director. Please someone tell this Greengrass guy and the responsible producers that a shaky/blurry/constantly zooming cam + fast cuts throughout the whole movie is NOT COOL! And especially not in normal/quiet conversation scenes and such. This is film student stuff. Please bring Doug Liman back!