Reminds me of when I purchased my first movie camera

Rating: 7/10 (27 July 2004)

This could have been such an excellent movie. But having seen it twice (and not because it's that good), I have to say the director should be taken out and have to watch it fifty times non stop and then tell me why he decided to blur all the action scenes.
People were walking out of the theater complaining about getting dizzy. Now, isn't it a shame, when the main thing to talk about a movie is it's terrible camera work.
Someone earlier stated that this is what the Bond movies should be and I couldn't agree more.
I give it a 7 but with normal camera work it would be been much higher.