*Spoiltes*Disappointing

Rating: Null/10 (1 September 2004)

*SPOILERS*
I was really looking forward to this after having seen the excellent original 'The Bourne Supremacy'.I couldn't wait to see where they'd take the plot and how they'd develop the characters a bit more. Unfortunately, it failed to live up to expectations. It is not a very satisfying movie, despite all the critical acclaim it's received. Hopefully the third sequel (which it seems inevitable will be made after the way this movie was made) will be back up to the standard of the original.
A brief introduction to the plot:
After discovering the secret behind 'Treadstone', the CIA assassination organisation, at the end of film one, Jason Bourne and his girlfriend Marie have started a new life together in India. Bourne is still trying to figure out more about his past, and Marie encourages him to write down all that he remembers in a notebook. However, Bourne spots that something's not right when he catches sight of a suspicious man (who is actually a Russian assasin). A car chase ensues, which ends up with Marie being shot and Bourne fooling the assasin into thinking that he died as well.
Now Bourne sets off on his own to find out who killed Marie, and to encounter some more secrets from his past. Also involved is a female CIA chief, who has found out the secret of Treadstone and is trying to bring Bourne in, and two characters from film one, played by Brian Cox and Julia Stiles.
The first problem with the film is the plot, which, compared to the first film's well-written plot, based more closely on the book, is very patchy indeed. It runs out of steam a good while before the end, and so the climactic action scene seems a bit tacked on to make things more exciting. The plot strand where Brian Cox is a 'baddie' did not seem very credible, and the scene where he shot himself was entirely predictable. Personally, I thought it would have been more interesting if he'd gone on the run.
Another mistake was to kill off Marie inside the first ten minutes. In the first film, she provided an opportunity for Bourne to explore his character, but here, the nearest we get to character developement for Bourne is a scene almost at the end of the film where he explains to a girl that he assasinated her father. This was a well done scene, but one well done scene does not a great film make.
Now I know I'm not the first to say this, but the visual style of the film was a real dud. The jerky camera thingey worked quite well in a few of the fight scenes, but all the way through...I was exhausted by the end, and not in a good way.
So, the plot never drew me in, the visuals put me off, and, when, about three-quarters of the way through the film, I was thinking about the way the scenes were filmed, and not the plot, I knew this movie hadn't worked. A real shame. Why couldn't they have written a better script, used Doug Liman to direct again, and made a better film?