Great movie, if only someone could steady the camera

Rating: 6/10 (30 July 2004)

What is this? Instead of showing us the action, they left it off and shook frenetically the camera instead. Is this a new way to save money or just be certain people wouldn't want to see the movie again? I am quite a bit disappointed that I was that much distracted.
It was so awful I had to look elsewhere from time to time. It was distracting from the otherwise quite good action movie.

The actors were remarkable, so I assume the direction was good. The plot was deployed in such a way I enjoyed discovering it, as I didn't read Ludlum's book. I even look forward seeing another Bourne movie hoping they will find another way to do action scenes.