Over the top and down the other side.....

Rating: 7/10 (1 February 2005)

It was hard to follow the story with the (I suppose) new technique of one second scenes throughout the entire movie. Did no one ever think to use a tripod? It would appear that in an effort to make the movie more exciting they shook the camera, made fast pans, out of focused shots with an abundance of scenes so dark the action was lost. The only long scenes were of inanimate objects or buildings with no connecting dialog. I am surprised that more people did not pan the director and editor.
Action movies have improved over the years with the shorter shots to keep you glued to the screen. This movie however is a good example of too much of a good thing and becomes un-watchable, if not disturbing.
I just hope this kind of garbage does not catch on. A movie should be entertaining, without making you nauseous.