They should have left him alone alright!

Rating: 5/10 (8 February 2005)

Only minor spoiler herein...
The tagline for the movie is that they should have left him alone and that goes for everyone else (apart from who they are referring to) I guess.
The first movie was a suspense movie. It had its action pauses and the thing I missed was the intuition of Bourne to danger. In the first movie he was able to "foresee" into the future through interpreting the signs. Something would be missing from the big picture and he knew what was wrong. That only happens in the beginning of the movie and it doesn't feel right, as if there is something missing from the recipe of success. Bourne has changed which one might expect but I don't thing they truly knew what he was then and what he is now. A rather random shift...
I saw in the extras of the DVD that they wanted to make something of a documentary-like movie but that camera was down right hard to watch... I believe it was superficially or awkwardly experimental if you like.
There were some things in the plot that were hard to believe but I won't go into them not to spoil anything, but I can say this: "They make Russian cars very sturdy these days"...
Too much of a macho where it wasn't like that according to my opinion. And the "excuse me but I murdered some chaps" scene was laughable. Pleeeeeeeaaaaaaase spare me Mr. Hollywood! Hey! Good action movie though!