Movies w/o Tripods

Rating: Null/10 (31 July 2004)

A great 70 minute movie stretched to 120 unbearable minutes by fractured editing and BlairWitchProject-esque camera work.
I'm a Robert Ludlum fan.. and have clear memories of wanting to see these books as movies while I was reading their first printing. I even remember liking the first movie, The Bourne Identity. But, The Bourne Supremacy has left me wondering who dropped the ball and how.
Did the script writers completely fail to add depth and flow to the story to the extent that their mistakes were later covered up by a frantic night in the editing room? Did the camera operators trade their tripods for coffee?
Honestly, I'd have given my $8.50 to sit through a 70min version sans the useless shaky filming & editing. But then.. I'm a quality over quantity type of guy.