Why many bad critics ?

Rating: Null/10 (18 December 2012)

I don't understand why so many people hated this movie. Its a decent movie in its category, it has great acting, nice action scenes and visual effects and an "ok" plot. Its serious, thrilling and makes you care for the guy more than in the other movies imo.
Yeah this movie doesn't really add anything to the series. Its obvious that they just wanted to keep selling the Bourne name by making the same type of movie but with a new actor/character while sadly adding the clichés of the other movies. That's what I like about this movie, they were able to make something very watchable out of this bad marketing idea. These days there's so many bad movies made by teams that had everything to make a great one...
Some say it had no beginning or ending. Since its a follow up of the other trilogy they skipped a lot thinking people would have seen the others. Also its supposed to be another trilogy, so in this perspective its normal to get this kind of ending. If its not what you like you can wait for the whole trilogy to come out.
This movie is not a masterpiece but its worth watching and deserves better than a 6/10.