Bourne's legacy(book and greengrass/damon's version) gets shredded

Rating: 4/10 (14 August 2012)

I actually hoped this movie would do justice to the old series even without Matt and Greengrass, but I was completely and utterly wrong in thinking so. My guess is if Robert Ludlam had been alive and watched this movie he would have made another book where Jason Bourne gets murdered by Tony Gilroy. I mean, what the hell did he think by penning a great novel/movie trilogy with idiotic plot and over dramatic dialogues and slow moving documentary styled movie (exception for old bourne trilogy as it was penned and Tony just had to furnish it a bit).Everyone here in the review stated that Jeremy did marvelous job without a script but personally he is not even one-fourth equivalent to Jason Bourne portrayed by Matt and the character of Rachiel weisz and the stupid plot about pill with virus was just made so that somehow they make a story around Bourne fame and then make money out of it. Even the action sequence couldn't hold out in front of Matt's Bourne trilogy, the action choreographer did some stunts which were really annoying and unrealistic say for example the bike sliding the rails.Even the music failed and was too annoying and didn't provide the vibe. And the extent of boring action sequence can be felt when Jeremy Renner(the protagonist) fell asleep during the bike riding sequence and his message on mirror "No More" indirectly could be taken as No More movies on Jason Bourne, I had enough of this(just joking).This movie has not even provided minimum eligibility to be tagged to the tail hair of Matt/Greengrass/Ludlam's version of Bourne. In the trivia its given that Before this movie was seriously considered, director Paul Greengrass jokingly suggested to make a fourth Bourne movie called "The Bourne Redundancy" and he was damn right about it.Hope they don't make another movie out of Bourne's name which could be as tiresome and boring as this one.