No more sequels.

Rating: 7/10 (9 August 2012)

Not as exciting as any of the first three films. Even though Jeremy Renner gave a fine performance that for me is still considered below Matt Damon's, the whole movie is lesser, in the plot, in the writing, in style, in wit, and in almost every way you look at it. The second part of the movie became totally different, and it was packed by chase scenes that just wanted to fill in for the last few minutes of the movie. For me it didn't felt like a "Bourne" movie. I was really looking up for Tony Gilroy who had brilliantly written the three films, they wanted to equal the first Bourne films but they fell short. In my opinion, the weakest in the series. Please no more unnecessary sequels.