Bourne is Still a Trilogy

Rating: 3/10 (12 January 2013)

Too long, too copycat, and had no business having Bourne in the title.
This is a perfect example of a movie that shows the heart of Hollywood decision-makers for what it is - full of fear. It is sad that so much money is spent on redundancy rather than creativity.
If this movie had its own title, its own storyline, its own everything - it could actually stand on its own merits. Instead, we have a franken-movie that attempts to graft onto a decent script these useless appendages and rotting leftovers from a dug up grave. Just plain sad.
Matt Damon was smart enough to know when to call it quits on Jason Bourne, why couldn't Hollywood? Oh yeah, that's right - it's Hollywood. Let's ride this horse 'till it drops, then prop it up with two-by-fours and pretend like we're riding it some more.
Bourne rode a motorcycle and did some tricks with it? Let's have this new guy ride a motorcycle, and do tricks with it too...only let's have THIS chase THREE TIMES as long as the other Bourne one - YEAH, THAT'LL MAKE IT BETTER!!! Bourne ran across rooftops? Let's have this guy run across rooftops too... because those are the only things we can do in action movies - motorcycle stunts and rooftop chases. I mean, what else is there in life and movies, right???
Pathetic.