Masterpiece

Rating: 10/10 (4 September 2009)

Looking back now, "The Bourne Identity" is an alluring string of pearls i can watch once a year w/o getting bored, which is no mean feat for a flick.
In 2002, i joyfully assumed that any sequel would keep the level of excellency, but "Bourne" II and III are pitiful hells of devaluing "Puke-Evoking Rapid Cuts Only Sedated Oafs May Acclaim", which abbreviates PERCOSOMA: a popular but rather quirky cinematic infestation with the potential to ruin any otherwise watchable film. The trivia of "The Bourne Supremacy" proudly states, that "The average length of a shot is 1.9 seconds.". Overdose of Percosoma. But "The Bourne Ultimatum" even tops it by the numbers.
Anyway, I seriously wonder why this new-millennium classic is not among the IMDb top 100. With "Memento" rightfully ranking 29, and the last and IMHO worst of the trilogy, "The Bourne Ultimatum" on 154 (by today's date), this chart certainly suffers from it's own peculiar sort of mental flaw.
All this must be Langley again, trying to alter the public's view on the Bourne case :)