what's up with this flick?

Rating: 2/10 (22 August 1999)

yeah, so it's shot with a camcorder and a 16mm (whatever that is) - how novel, but it certainly doesn't make for great or even good film-making in my books. now don't get me wrong, i'm certainly no film-school graduate or new york times movie critic but i do have taste and sensibilities. all my senses told me about this film was that the reason for my uneasiness and even nausea was attributable primarily to the terrors of that *!@#$ shaky camera rather than to those of any blair witch. believe me, i forgot about this movie as soon as it was over. but not to seem completely sour-assed, i will say that it was a marginally creepy film. but, again, the keyword here is novelty.