Waste of Time

Rating: 2/10 (16 September 2000)

I saw this film long after the hype was over. If it hadn't been for the jumpy photography, I would have fallen asleep. No discernable plot, gratuitous profanity - which added absolutely nothing to the film - and poorly acted.
I know they're making a sequel, but I have to ask why? I think I'll wait for it to come out on video - then spend the time reading a book. My rating was 2.