What exactly was the point of redoing SPIDER MAN?

Rating: 6/10 (8 August 2012)

This is going to be the easiest review i have ever written.
Considerably better cast taken on to portray the characters, one clearly see the difference. Andrew Garfield excels in the titular role and gives an impression Tobey Maguire was never able to give.
The problem with the movie was that i could not help think why make such a repetitive movie with same story, twists and turns. I knew what was going to happen throughout the film which disappoints exponentially. I sincerely expected that if the makers were daring to redo spider-man again, they must have something different for a change, but i was proved wrong in the first half an hour of the movie.
Had this been the start of the trilogy which would have been released before the previous trilogy, i would have said the movie was really good and effectively made but now, it was totally forgettable and a waste of money to produce the same stuff again and again.