Good action and actors but bad director and script

Rating: 6/10 (21 July 2012)

First I will comment that this film let me a bit frustrated because it is a mediocre film when it could be a great film with only minors modifications all around Spider-man nonsense actions. I will say a few examples of BAD THING:
_Spider-man constantly take off his mask without any reason (why?, only to see main character face?) _Perter Parker showing is new strong and athletic powers (are Peter stupid or what?)
_some parts of film, like discovering is power, are rushed and have few minutes and other insignificant actions, like how he enter in Oscorp, to plot take a lot of time (what did think the director?). Making the film have a big holes in the argument progression.
_The romance in film looked lukewarm, forced and superficial.
_Peter is not a nerd and is personality have not big change after become spider-man and be Spider-man seems as a play thing until the end of film (how can one create attachment to Peter/Spider-man with this "cool" Peter from beginning. Other time what the hell is the director thinking?)
_...
:(
But not all is bad, lets do a list of GOOD THINGS:
_Good actors (to bad that script and directors don't make them shine with more deep personality characters)
_Very good special effects
_Credible bad guy character
_Good actions scenes with villain involved (not others irrelevant scenes)
In resume, not being a bad movie is not good neither, is a bit insubstantial in plot and characters development making only another hero movie that will no be remembered is not a well recognized hero like Spider-man was the main character. I know that normally no good make comparatives but I will because others Spider-man films are very recent and the director have to considerate that people will make comparatives. If you compare to the Spider-man of 2002, this is catastrophic losing in all aspects to his predecessor.