A reboot that really was't necessary, and the amazing spider-man where was he i just found one in sam riami's film.

Rating: 7/10 (19 April 2014)

This review may contain spoilers.
A great franchise did it really require a reboot???
frankly I did love the dark tone of the film really justifying and very logical the way it goes unlike the previous Spiderman trilogy. its interesting the way plots where,lined and Andrew garfield gets bit by a radioactive spider at oscorp the movie was so logic unlike it was't so stupid as the previous spider man.
Andrew garfield he really justifies the role of Spiderman young and energetic and gwen stacy very pretty serving as spideys love interest, I really loved the dark tone and the plot. And truly a very logical interesting story.
BUT now wait where is the amazing Spiderman, where is that amazing factor why is the film so dark why doesn't Spiderman appear in day light , what happened to his spidey suit he looks more like a man in a robber mask then a spidey suit... The suit was completely dark it was so clear till end that you do see a Spiderman..
the villain was good corners as lizard... But still I do agree the,first spider man was not,logical neither darker but seriously it had that amazing factor it kept u entertained for next 2 hours, the wow moments when the building catches those stunts still stand in your mind, such sequences aren't in the amazing Spiderman the wow factor is missing.
I agree I love the story but the screenplay did lag and it was't well executed. Other than that I felt the casting was the best every one justified to,there roles Andrew garfield simply is the friendly neighbour good.
so before we wrap, I did like the film but I didn love it did drag, The amazing Spiderman at all, it did miss the wow factor which Spiderman carries.. Kudos to a darker and a realistic story line but a bit weakly executed screenplay hopefully we can expect something amazing from the sequel, I personally feel a reboot was't required yet..