Romeo and Juliet: Spiderman version

Rating: 2/10 (29 June 2012)

Emma stone and Andrew Garfield spend a lot of time in each others breath.
An ensemble cast that is superior to other films with a pathetic story and average cinematography. A very good script with good actors and failing plot.
Mr Sam Raimi should have made this movie keeping the actors same including the screen-play.
Fairly good direction but i don't want to pay for seeing school-kids lick and salivate in each others mouths.
Maybe if they would have taken Sharlto Copley instead of Rhys Ifans i would have added another 3 stars.
Its a romantic movie gyrating around the emotions of school kids peter parker and Gwen Stacy .......everything else takes a backseat. I was bugged and so i went to take a leak during their kiss.
Technically the movie is flawed. The spiderweb is not produced by his own body i reckon, but a device he built that produces the web.
Another thing CGI is crap. You don't expect it to get overlooked with cheap multi-core chips and GPU's. Sub-standard quality-less animations.
Oh! the bad guy-- a giant lizard that can easily be squashed by a freight train or truck........Duh.
Much better than Prometheus because actors are very good.
I would applaud Andrew, martin,Chris Zylka, the whole cast and the screenplay guys for making this film OK.....the story and romance just makes me crap in my pants.
Too much melodrama and emotion.
Spiderman 3 can be renamed: The Amazing spider-man.