Unimpressed!

Rating: 1/10 (13 April 2013)

What exactly was this? A remake? Or a prequel? Not clear.
First of all, who the hell remakes a 5 year old movie!?
It's acceptable to remake movies from the 70s, 80s, and even the 90s! But the original "Spiderman" franchise is only FIVE bloody years old! Come on! If it ain't broke, why fix it?
If it was meant as a prequel, then why are we seeing the same stuff we saw in the original, and why are all the characters so different?
I honestly have no idea what possessed these people to produce such crap. The original "Spiderman" was (and still is) 100 times better, and it's not REMOTELY old or outdated.
By the way... this is NOT an action movie; it's a chick-flick! Literally.
And what's with this annoying tendency to cast 30-year-olds to play teenagers? It's lame. Speaking of the actors, they couldn't have picked a worst set of amateurs. I don't even remember their names, and I hope they're going to retire from the movie industry sometime soon, because they have no business being in it.
The direction was seriously bad. Like I said before, it's NOT an action movie, but the VERY LITTLE action there is, is happening in total darkness, so you don't actually see it! Stupid and annoying!
This is NOT the real "Spiderman"; it's a cheap imitation. Some pathetic 30-year-old wimp, pretending to be a teenager, is running around and getting beat up by regular folk? What an insult to "Spiderman" fans!
Oh, and why release this utter nonsense in 3D if 90% of the movie is in 2D?
This weak, useless, uninspired chick-flick was made for one reason only: to capitalize on the name of the "Spiderman" franchise and rip people (fans) off!
Shame on you!