Good but could be lot better

Rating: 5/10 (1 July 2012)

Back in 2001,when first spiderman movie released,i had mixed feelings about that.I loved that sam raimi version but Toby wasn't the one I imagined as Peter Parker;But Andrew Garfield is just terrific as Peter but somehow director webb couldn't tell the story properly.
Well I loved the beginning,the different build up than previous films and obviously characters are more believable here.Be it Stunning Gwen Stacy(Emma Stone) or his uncle.Moreover,his angry teenage version quite better than nerdy peter we've seen so far.Webb created some AMAZING moments between peter and gwen but he mixed up three things.
First,he couldn't decide whether he should follow the basic storyline or create something of his own.....here's why we will miss several key points from comics and he tried to go through the basics too and so we started to feel'been there,seen before" feeling.
Second,The action scenes are good but could be better.If you are watching in 3D,then you will enjoy web swing but hey,THIS IS AVENGERS YEAR...so audience expect a lot more excitement, a lot more unpredictable thrill Third,Climax is rushed and the movie is dragged without a reason.Frankly,villain isn't as threatening as even green goblin.
But still you will enjoy this movie because Webb tried to tell the story in a very refreshing way and this is a younger and smarter spiderman.But it is the awesome performances from the main cast that lives up to your expectation.Andrew is best spidey...he is nerdy but brave,nervous but witty,young but aspirational and courageous new peter parker that we wanted to see for such a long time.Emma stone is way better than Kirsten Dunst.est of the cast is brilliant but Dr. Curt's character is not well written so we got an uneven performance from Rhys Ifans as Lizard.
Overall,a good film which could be a lot better(specially when you've so good director and a great cast)