The Amazing Spiderman

Rating: 2/10 (17 July 2012)

I am going to start right out with a negative yell and say that the first scene that had a "good taste gland" impact on me was when Peter helped Dr. Connors with an experiment (somewhere in the first half of the movie) just by pushing a button one more time than his mentor, thus showing his genius mind behind the raw athletic animal vigilante that is Spiderman and proving his "science" skills to Connors that looked to be very impressed by his pupil's performance in what others may think requires years of study and experience to succeed in. It was disturbing. Made me write this 5 line phrase. Since that I started to notice all the cheesy scenes that were actually ripping me apart from the tragic psychological identity of Spiderman's Character provided by the Animated Series and comic books since I was a little boy. Truth be told, The Dark Knight trilogy (I'm pretty sure I'm going to like the third movie) boosted my standards several levels up in what is now the Hollywood comic book interpretation wave. Also, this movie was supposed to be the chosen one and bring balance to the force that was thrown towards darkness by the last Spiderman interpretation of the 21st century. But it was not. We may have to wait for the next one. A new hope... These inappropriate puns are saying (what we all know) in an aggressive way that, in the end, this film will not be as epic in the next 5-10 years. It's a question you can answer right away about any film you see: "Will it be a reference?". And the answer in this case: "It could have been better". BTW - The raw conclusion: By the King Kong scene, pretty much everyone knows Peter Parker is Spiderman.