TASM2 = too much hype for nothing... huge disappointment...

Rating: 3/10 (5 May 2014)

First of all, i have to say that nowadays these movie-producers and film-companies makes trailers which looks just spectacular and that was the reason, why i wanted to see "The Amazing Spider-Man 2". But yesterday evening, when i started to watch this movie, after 30 minutes, i was so disappointed for everything i saw. This new Spidey, Andrew Garfield is really bad actor, he also doesn't look interesting, he doesn't wake up any emotions when i see his acting and also Emma Stone for sure not suit in serious roles, because she is same time overacting and looks like semi-dirty hooker. For her, only suitable movie-roles is comedy roles for example "Easy-A" etc.
IN Spider-Man movies (NOT "The Amazing Spider-Man") Tobey Maguire as spidey was perfect choice to be spidey. Nerd guy, who looks credible in his part (funny, serious, emotional). But of course all good comes to the end and writers/producers destroyed Spider-Man-trilogy with Tobey Maguire goofy and insane dancing and filled those movies with cliché after cliché. And when you compare Willem Dafoe's and James Franco acting to TASM2... well, they did theirpart as villains perfectly. Dane DeHaan is just ridiculously bad actor. He is in my top 5 worse and most annoying actors in DC comic movies.
I have to ask, what is happened for the audiences? Why people rank these movies so high in IMDb?!? Have you really lost your capability to rate acting, script, twists, overall story etc. If you look this TASM2 again with time and focus on actors, script and everything else, you have to see and understand that these new spidey-movies has bad script and story, terrible actors, for example Dane DeHaan, who looks like discount young Leonardo DiCaprio IN VERY ANNOYING way and takes overacting to completely new level. DeHaan and especially his "acting" is so annoying, that when i see his face, i wanted to punch him and stop watching this film. Only actor who makes decent work is of course Jamie Foxx as Electro, but WHY he had to be some kind of cliché GOOFY-CRAZY genius? WHY!?!? We have seen this so many times, and it never suits for these highly talented and spectacular actors. I just have to ask, why he couldn't be just talented, intelligent and genius lab-rat (Bruce Banner/Edward Norton style), who became Electro after accident. Why they need to make Jamie Foxx look like retarded-monkey?!? Fight scenes was boring, and also new Rhino is ridiculous. To destroy one of the most interesting super-villain in Spidey movies they had to made him as machine, not monster-mutation as he is in cartoons. What else?!
I don't accept that these highly hyped and over 100 million budget movies are made as bad as TASM2. I hope they launch one more time new Spidey-concept and this time they choose real actors and makes perfect story etc. This movie was just BIGGEST disappointment and only made to cash out money as much as possible((