The three D's. Dry, disappointing, and drawling.

Rating: 3/10 (17 April 2004)

This film was a total bomb! No history war fan should see this film. It is so bad. I even told my history teacher not to take the challenge kids as a field trip to see The Alamo. When I mean the film was dry, I mean, there wasn't much to it. There was only one mini skirmish and nightly cannon bombardments throughout the film till the end. there just wasn't much to this supposedly fantastic film. throughout the film I had to use my watch to see how much was left of this film. My dad was thinking also when this film was going to end. I was eager to escape the theater. When I mean it was a disappointing, the action level was low. There were only two battles at the end. the casting did a descent job though, which was probably the only reason why I didn't depart the theater, and to see the finale. When I mean the film was drawling, I mean it went on and on for ages. Nothing was to the film! i should e-mail the director and tell him he had made the worst war film in movie history. I was surprised Another probably with the film was that the violence was so intense for a PG-13. It should have been rated R. I give this film a 3 out 0f 10 because of the casts' performance for a lame film, the effects, and the battle sequences. I wrote this comment of The Alamo.