The usual uninformed biased, maudlin, representation

Rating: 3/10 (12 April 2004)

The highpoint was the cannonball bird's-eye view of the Church's campus. The low point, almost everything else.
The only difference from the version of 1960 was the continued footage beyond the Alamo's demise to satisfy the American penchant for revenge, an old concept from the American frontier.
I initially was attracted to the film based upon claims of "fair" historical treatments. That is laughable.
I actually walked out at the Alamo's final suppression as the film had wasted enough of my time.
The producers clearly underestimate the American public's ability to face the truth of their past.