What's wrong with this film?

Rating: Null/10 (15 November 1999)

Many people advised me not to see this film, but I didn't pay attention to them. At the end I thought "what's wrong with this film?" It is well done, the locations are fantastic, the photography is wonderful, the battle scenes are unbelievable... I read Michael Crichton's book a few years ago and I think it's his best. I was really afraid they would change the story a lot as they usually do with Michael Crichton's stories (If you read Jurassic Park or Congo or Rising Sun you'll know what I mean). The story was reduced to fit the usual film length, but almost everything is there. To put in fewer words, I really liked this film, and I wasn't able to see why so many people didn't.