The movie isn't bad, but the screen script isn't good

Rating: 5/10 (11 November 2010)

T1 and T2 were a shock each one, they had a strong dramatic impact (even with moderate special effects as in T1). And even today they are classic. But what is and has this movie? The movie isn't bad, it's watchable. There is good actors. But it also has a lame plot and isn't able to create a good believably story. Because the lame plot ruins its atmosphere. Alas. Many right things have been said by other commentators. I point just one total cliché that is most annoying for me. I'm saying about heart giving thing. The act of sacrifice, that was used in previous series, because of good plot which organic part it was, worked, was true and believable. In this movie it seems completely false, stupid and melodramatic. The authors trying convince us that there is a total war for survival of entire human race. And there is no donor-heart for dying leader (no cadavers, no severely injured in the permanent battle, no wishful donation from disabled man or woman, unfit for active service), except one from the allied cyborg with full human identity who one costs half of the whole resistance? And they dump him just for heart? Are you kidding? Or it's morally OK for director and the main auditory because he has too much artificial implants and couldn't be considered as pure blood citizen anymore and henceforth may be dead, nobody cares (the usual popular chauvinistic motive about second rate people in American movies)? «They killed Kenny! Bastards!»