Not as bad as the they say

Rating: 6/10 (16 July 2009)

Few minor spoilers ------------------
Just saw it around 30 minutes ago and must say that it was not as bad as the critics etc. said it was.
Good Parts first ---------------- First of all the action, CGI & stunts, were well done and believable. The movie had a very real feel to it, a bit like The Dark Knight. The post judgment day world was not forced on us, we could feel it by the look and atmosphere of the movie's environment.
There were many references to the first 3 installments + an encounter with a very important T-101 / T-800.
Overall acting was good though a bit wooden sometimes. But i guess John Conner & the other survivors have so much on his mind that they have to be played with little or no emotion.
OK now two the bad parts ------------------------
I did not like how the infiltrator was able to have so much free will, being a programable machine i mean.
The plot could have been better and the interactions between the various characters had a certain ham handedness to it.
It was too easy to get into and out of Cybernet HQ, i mean isn't the technology supposed to be cutting edge, out there.
There were some plot holes and unexplained things etc.
OK Final Word --------------
Not as bad as Wolverine (That one sucked big time) Not as bad as Transformers 2 (Only redeeming factor was tits/ass + some good CGI Robt on Robt action) Not as bad as T3 (Don't get me started on that one, but i liked the flower sun shades)
Have fun and enjoy and wait for AVATAR
By the way guys if you liked my review watch "The man from earth" you may like it.