Not totally there

Rating: 3/10 (13 June 2011)

First of all I would like to say that I really hate people that write long reviews of movies. After all is just a movie is not like a vital part of history. So I will keep it short.
Not a bad movie. The action scenes are well worthy of a Terminator franchise. The main problem I have with this film is mostly the character of "John Connor". Maybe it was the writers or maybe just the actor who was wrongly casted. I don't know.
In the first film they start with this mystical image of the one man responsible for the survival of the human race "John Connor" In the second film we have a smart, witty and somehow strong representation of the kid who will become the leader of the resistance against the machine.
However; in this film we have a sissy, insecure, scary cat with an amazing lack of confidence dude by the name of "John Connor". The portrayal of the character was pathetic. Are you telling that this joke of a man will be the saviour of the human race. Sad.
Then the other problem I have with this movies is that stupid scene was the one where Arnold gets reprogrammed by the T-X. John Connor asks the T-800 not to kill him and the Terminator obeys. Reese said in part 1 It can't be bargained with" and now John did just that. Sad. I couldn't believe what I was seeing.
Anyhow, I promised I would keep it short so I will.
Seeya