Terminator 3: Least of the 3. No Spoilers.

Rating: Null/10 (10 August 2003)

While the movie was not bad by any stretch of the imagination, it was not a James Cameron film, and therefore did not have the same flow as his works, which include the last two Terminator movies.
The story follows its natural progression in the trilogy quite well, though many people may find its inevitable turns unsettling. It does leave itself open for more in the series.
Arnold looked more buff, more ripped and in better shape than he did in the second movie. He did a good job, marred only by the fact that he did not have James Cameron directing.
The movie is worth seeing, and even worth owning. It is not, however, perfect nor will it go town into the movie annals of notable works.