Is this a serious film, or a parody?

Rating: 3/10 (11 September 2011)

Before I go apesh.t on this film... I just need to know... Why? Who allowed this movie to be filmed? Was anybody serious about this film? Whose idea was this? Of course, no point in asking questions... here are the answers. This film is very, very bad. Johnathan Mostow needs to go work someplace else, like in circus as a clown. If he wants to be funny, give him a chance to be a stand up comedian, not to ruin a good film with this sequel. Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) was one of the best movies and best SF movies ever made if you ask me... and if you are planing a sequel... give it something worthy, not this crap! The entire film also borrows from the previous film. That's mental!
Arnold was good. In his Terminator element, it wasn't any of his fault! The Terminator (Arnie) here looks funny, his character was used for a entertaining purposes! In the first one, he was a dark cyborg with a mission to kill, in the second he was a protector... but here he was a laugh stock! That is a damn sacrilege! The writers and director decided to make one big campy parody of the entire film and title character. The same goes with other characters. Nick Sthal was solid as John Connor, slowly on a way to become a great military leader. But, writers ruined his character too. Claire Danes is a good actress, but here, she messed herself up. Her character was funny, from a veterinarian to warrior women over night doesn't seem right to me! Kristana Loken. OK I admit that we needed a woman Terminator, why not? But, her T-X character was too much, an endoskeleton that has a liquid metal? That's too much, an anti-terminator terminator! Gimme a break! And, of course Earl Boen makes a cameo as Dr. Silverman, also, alas... as a laughing stock. The only thing good here were special effects, the special effects were even better than anything else here. Money down the drain... don't watch it...