With The Future Already Written, What's The Point?

Rating: 2/10 (13 February 2015)

Question: Can a sequel get much worse than T3?.... Answer: I think not.
Regardless of its whopping $200 million budget, T3 (which, of course, focused on violence, explosions and mass destruction) (Well, what did I expect?) certainly turned out to be some of the absolute stalest storytelling that I've had the displeasure of seeing in a mighty long time.
If you ask me - I am utterly sick to death of Arnold's "Terminator" shtick. And, this time around, Arnold's performance (that featured some of the lamest one-liners imaginable) was a total embarrassment on all counts.
After being paid a ridiculous $30 million to star in this "Save-The-Future" clunker, I seriously think that Arnold should be absolutely ashamed of himself for delivering such a crappy portrayal of a T-101 bimbo.
With T3's story simply going over the same, old, tired ground, again and again, the viewer would have to be a totally clueless nitwit not to see that this idiotic, action yarn was going nowhere, fast.
Anyways - I thought that Nick Stahl made for an utterly pathetic and completely despicable "Saviour" as John Connor. And having the super-upgraded TX model be a hot-looking woman was the absolute last straw in Sci-Fi stupidity that broke the terminator's back.